VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sergio Filho
dblp:280/1670
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › machine teaching
interactive teaching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Teaching with Limited Information on the Learner's Behaviour · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
machine teaching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Teaching with Limited Information on the Learner's Behaviour · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical evaluation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Teaching with Limited Information on the Learner's BehaviourabstractMachine Teaching studies how efficiently a Teacher can guide a Learner to a target hypothesis. We focus on the model of Machine Teaching with a black box learner introduced in [Dasgupta et al., ICML 2019], where the teaching is done interactively without having any knowledge of the Learner’s algorithm and class of hypotheses, apart from the fact that it contains the target hypothesis $h^*$. We first refine some existing results for this model and, then, we study new variants of it. Motivated by the realistic possibility that $h^*$ is not available to the learner, we consider the case where the teacher can only aim at having the learner converge to a best available approximation of $h^*$. We also consider weaker black box learners, where, in each round, the choice of the consistent hypothesis returned to the Teacher is not adversarial, and in particular, we show that better provable bounds can be obtained for a type of Learner that moves to the next hypothesis smoothly, preferring hypotheses that are close to the current one; and for another type of Learner that can provide to the Teacher hypotheses chosen at random among those consistent with the examples received so far. Finally, we present an empirical evaluation of our basic interactive teacher on real datasets. Ferdinando Cicalese, Sergio Filho, Eduardo Sany Laber, Marco Molinaro 0001 |
ICML | 2 |