Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eshkol Eytan
dblp:280/3611
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6932-3746ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 77% Rendering · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | 3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of Clouds · ICCV 2021 |
Environmental and earth informatics
atmospheric science |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | 4D Cloud Scattering Tomography · ICCV 2021 |
Computational photography and imaging › tomographic imaging
computed tomography |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | 4D Cloud Scattering Tomography · ICCV 2021 |
Rendering › light transport
scattering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | 3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of Clouds · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physics-based simulation · 1.0physics-based inverse scattering · 1.0hybrid model · 1.0gradient-based optimization · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0computed tomography · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Imagers for Spaceborne Cloud TomographyabstractSpaceborne observations serve as input to models and retrieval algorithms of various atmospheric properties. Specifically, we seek 3D volumetric scattering tomography of clouds. Towards this, cloud-fields are to be imaged simultaneously from multiple directions. The CloudCT project aims to demonstrate this by a formation of ten nanosatellites. Based on this data, scattering tomography will seek the 3D volumetric distribution of cloud microphysical properties. We present constraints and fundamental considerations for spaceborne formation-based cloud tomography. We quantitatively compare visible polarized imagers, visible unpolarized imagers, and short-wave infra-red unpolarized imagers. Each possibility is considered using a large eddy simulation of clouds. We study tomographic quality in the presence of sensor and photon noise, calibration errors and stray light. We find that a polarized imager of a red waveband is preferable. Vadim Holodovsky, Masada Tzabari, Omer Shubi, Eshkol Eytan, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, Klaus Schilling 0001, Yoav Y. Schechner |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 4 |
| 2022 | Settings for Spaceborne 3-D Scattering Tomography of Liquid-Phase Clouds by the CloudCT MissionabstractWe introduce a comprehensive method for space-borne 3D volumetric scattering-tomography of cloud micro-physics, developed for the CloudCT mission. The retrieved micro-physical properties are the liquid-water-content and effective droplet radius within a cloud. We include a model for a perspective polarization imager, and an assumption of 3D variation of there. Elements of our work include computed tomography initialization by a parametric horizontally-uniform micro-physical model. This results in smaller errors than the prior art. The mean absolute errors of the retrieved liquid-water-content and effective-radius are reduced from 62% and 28% to 40% and 9%, respectively. The parameters of this initialization are determined by a grid search of a cost function. Furthermore, we add viewpoints in the cloudbow region, to better sample the polarized scattering phase function. The suggested advances are evaluated by retrieval of a set of clouds generated by large-eddy simulations. Masada Tzabari, Vadim Holodovsky, Omer Shubi, Eshkol Eytan, Ilan Koren, Yoav Y. Schechner |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 4 |
| 2021 | 4D Cloud Scattering TomographyabstractWe derive computed tomography (CT) of a time-varying volumetric scattering object, using a small number of moving cameras. We focus on passive tomography of dynamic clouds, as clouds have a major effect on the Earth’s climate. State of the art scattering CT assumes a static object. Existing 4D CT methods rely on a linear image formation model and often on significant priors. In this paper, the angular and temporal sampling rates needed for a proper recovery are discussed. Spatiotemporal CT is achieved using gradient-based optimization, which accounts for the correlation time of the dynamic object content. We demonstrate this in physics-based simulations and on experimental real-world data. Roi Ronen, Yoav Y. Schechner, Eshkol Eytan |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2021 | 3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of CloudsabstractWe present 3DeepCT, a deep neural network for computed tomography, which performs 3D reconstruction of scattering volumes from multi-view images. The architecture is dictated by the stationary nature of atmospheric cloud fields. The task of volumetric scattering tomography aims at recovering a volume from its 2D projections. This problem has been approached by diverse inverse methods based on signal processing and physics models. However, such techniques are typically iterative, exhibiting a high computational load and a long convergence time. We show that 3DeepCT outperforms physics-based inverse scattering methods, in accuracy, as well as offering orders of magnitude improvement in computational run-time. We further introduce a hybrid model that combines 3DeepCT and physics-based analysis. The resultant hybrid technique enjoys fast inference time and improved recovery performance. Yael Sde-Chen, Yoav Y. Schechner, Vadim Holodovsky, Eshkol Eytan |
ICCV | 4 |