Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eshkol Eytan

dblp:280/3611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6932-3746ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 77% Rendering · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.512021
3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of Clouds · ICCV 2021
Environmental and earth informatics
atmospheric science
0.512021
4D Cloud Scattering Tomography · ICCV 2021
Computational photography and imaging › tomographic imaging
computed tomography
0.512021
4D Cloud Scattering Tomography · ICCV 2021
Rendering › light transport
scattering
0.112021
3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of Clouds · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physics-based simulation · 1.0physics-based inverse scattering · 1.0hybrid model · 1.0gradient-based optimization · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0computed tomography · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Imagers for Spaceborne Cloud Tomography
abstract
Spaceborne observations serve as input to models and retrieval algorithms of various atmospheric properties. Specifically, we seek 3D volumetric scattering tomography of clouds. Towards this, cloud-fields are to be imaged simultaneously from multiple directions. The CloudCT project aims to demonstrate this by a formation of ten nanosatellites. Based on this data, scattering tomography will seek the 3D volumetric distribution of cloud microphysical properties. We present constraints and fundamental considerations for spaceborne formation-based cloud tomography. We quantitatively compare visible polarized imagers, visible unpolarized imagers, and short-wave infra-red unpolarized imagers. Each possibility is considered using a large eddy simulation of clouds. We study tomographic quality in the presence of sensor and photon noise, calibration errors and stray light. We find that a polarized imager of a red waveband is preferable.
Vadim Holodovsky, Masada Tzabari, Omer Shubi, Eshkol Eytan, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, Klaus Schilling 0001, Yoav Y. Schechner
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.4
2022 Settings for Spaceborne 3-D Scattering Tomography of Liquid-Phase Clouds by the CloudCT Mission
abstract
We introduce a comprehensive method for space-borne 3D volumetric scattering-tomography of cloud micro-physics, developed for the CloudCT mission. The retrieved micro-physical properties are the liquid-water-content and effective droplet radius within a cloud. We include a model for a perspective polarization imager, and an assumption of 3D variation of there. Elements of our work include computed tomography initialization by a parametric horizontally-uniform micro-physical model. This results in smaller errors than the prior art. The mean absolute errors of the retrieved liquid-water-content and effective-radius are reduced from 62% and 28% to 40% and 9%, respectively. The parameters of this initialization are determined by a grid search of a cost function. Furthermore, we add viewpoints in the cloudbow region, to better sample the polarized scattering phase function. The suggested advances are evaluated by retrieval of a set of clouds generated by large-eddy simulations.
Masada Tzabari, Vadim Holodovsky, Omer Shubi, Eshkol Eytan, Ilan Koren, Yoav Y. Schechner
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.4
2021 4D Cloud Scattering Tomography
abstract
We derive computed tomography (CT) of a time-varying volumetric scattering object, using a small number of moving cameras. We focus on passive tomography of dynamic clouds, as clouds have a major effect on the Earth’s climate. State of the art scattering CT assumes a static object. Existing 4D CT methods rely on a linear image formation model and often on significant priors. In this paper, the angular and temporal sampling rates needed for a proper recovery are discussed. Spatiotemporal CT is achieved using gradient-based optimization, which accounts for the correlation time of the dynamic object content. We demonstrate this in physics-based simulations and on experimental real-world data.
Roi Ronen, Yoav Y. Schechner, Eshkol Eytan
ICCV3
2021 3DeepCT: Learning Volumetric Scattering Tomography of Clouds
abstract
We present 3DeepCT, a deep neural network for computed tomography, which performs 3D reconstruction of scattering volumes from multi-view images. The architecture is dictated by the stationary nature of atmospheric cloud fields. The task of volumetric scattering tomography aims at recovering a volume from its 2D projections. This problem has been approached by diverse inverse methods based on signal processing and physics models. However, such techniques are typically iterative, exhibiting a high computational load and a long convergence time. We show that 3DeepCT outperforms physics-based inverse scattering methods, in accuracy, as well as offering orders of magnitude improvement in computational run-time. We further introduce a hybrid model that combines 3DeepCT and physics-based analysis. The resultant hybrid technique enjoys fast inference time and improved recovery performance.
Yael Sde-Chen, Yoav Y. Schechner, Vadim Holodovsky, Eshkol Eytan
ICCV4