Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guotao Yang
dblp:280/8835
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 76% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 15% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 4% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
inference serving |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | SLOpt: Serving Real-Time Inference Pipeline With Strict Latency Constraint · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 Harpagon: Minimizing DNN Serving Cost via Efficient Dispatching, Scheduling and Splitting · INFOCOM 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TightLLM: Maximizing Throughput for LLM Inference via Adaptive Offloading Policy · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Harpagon: Minimizing DNN Serving Cost via Efficient Dispatching, Scheduling and Splitting · INFOCOM 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › inference serving
DNN serving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Harpagon: Minimizing DNN Serving Cost via Efficient Dispatching, Scheduling and Splitting · INFOCOM 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Harpagon: Minimizing DNN Serving Cost via Efficient Dispatching, Scheduling and Splitting · INFOCOM 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource provisioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SLOpt: Serving Real-Time Inference Pipeline With Strict Latency Constraint · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU memory management |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | TightLLM: Maximizing Throughput for LLM Inference via Adaptive Offloading Policy · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trade-compute-for-transfer · 1.7adaptive offloading policy · 1.7latency splitting · 0.9cascade workload estimation · 0.9batch scheduling · 0.9adaptive batch drop · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Harpagon: Minimizing DNN Serving Cost via Efficient Dispatching, Scheduling and SplittingabstractAdvances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have significantly contributed to the development of real-time video processing applications. Efficient scheduling of DNN workloads in cloud-hosted inference systems is crucial to minimizing serving costs while meeting application latency constraints. However, existing systems suffer from excessive module latency during request dispatching, low execution throughput during module scheduling, and wasted latency budget during latency splitting for multi-DNN applications, which undermines their capability to minimize the serving cost. In this paper, we design a DNN inference system called Harpagon, which minimizes the serving cost under latency constraints with a three-level design. It first maximizes the batch collection rate with a batch-aware request dispatch policy to minimize the module latency. It then maximizes the module throughput with multi-tuple configurations and proper amount of dummy requests. It also carefully splits the end-to-end latency into per-module latency budget to minimize the total serving cost for multi-DNN applications. Evaluation shows that Harpagon outperforms the state of the art by 1.49 to 2.37 times in serving cost while satisfying the latency objectives. Additionally, compared to the optimal solution using brute force search, Harpagon derives the lower bound of serving cost for 91.5% workloads with millisecond level runtime. Yitao Hu, Ziqi Gong, Guotao Yang, Wenxin Li 0001, Xiulong Liu 0001, Keqiu Li, Hao Wang 0022 |
INFOCOM | 4 |
| 2025 | TightLLM: Maximizing Throughput for LLM Inference via Adaptive Offloading PolicyabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, largely due to their substantial model size. However, this also results in significant GPU memory demands during inference. To address these challenges on hardware with limited GPU memory, existing approaches employ offloading techniques that offload unused tensors to CPU memory, thereby reducing GPU memory usage. Since offloading involves data transfer between GPU and CPU, it introduces transfer overhead. To mitigate this, prior works typically overlap data transfer with GPU computation using a fixed pipelining strategy applied uniformly across all inference iterations, referred to asstaticoffloading. However, static offloading policies fail to maximize inference throughput because they cannot adapt to the dynamically changing transfer overhead during the inference process, leading to increasing GPU idleness and reduced inference throughput.We propose that offloading policies should beadaptiveto the varying transfer overhead across inference iterations to maximize inference throughput. To this end, we design and implement an adaptive offloading-based inference system called TightLLM with two key innovations. First, its key-value (KV) distributor employs atrade-compute-for-transferstrategy to address growing transfer overhead by dynamically recomputing portions of the KV cache, effectively overlapping data transfer with computation and minimizing GPU idleness. Second, TightLLM’s weight loader slices model weights and distributes the loading processacross multiple batches, amortizing the excessive weight loading overhead and significantly improving throughput. Evaluation across various combinations of GPU hardware and LLM models shows that TightLLM achieves 1.3 to 23 times higher throughput during the decoding phase and 1.2 to 22 times higher throughput in the prefill phase compared to state-of-the-art offloading systems. Due to the higher throughput in prefill and decoding phases, TightLLM can reduce the completion time for large-scale tasks, which involve processing and generating a substantial number of tokens, by 59.6% to 94.9%. Yitao Hu, Xiulong Liu 0001, Guotao Yang, Sheng Chen 0015, Laiping Zhao, Wenxin Li 0001, Keqiu Li |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 3 |
| 2025 | SLOpt: Serving Real-Time Inference Pipeline With Strict Latency ConstraintabstractThe rise of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) has driven the demand for complex and customized real-time inference tasks, often requiring cascading multiple deep neural network (DNN) models into inference pipelines. However, these pipelines pose significant challenges due to scheduling complexity, particularly in maintaining strict latency service level objectives (SLOs). Existing systems serve pipelines with model-independent scheduling policies, which ignore the unique workload characteristics introduced by model cascading in the inference pipeline, leading to SLO violations and resource inefficiencies. In this paper, we propose that the serving system should exploit the model-cascading nature and inter-model workload dependency of the inference pipeline to ensure strict latency SLO cost-effectively. Based on this, we design and implementSLOpt, a serving system optimized for real-time inference pipelines with a three-stage co-design of workload estimation, resource provisioning, and request execution.SLOptproposes cascade workload estimation and ahead-of-time tuning, which together address the challenge of cascade blocking and head-of-line blocking in workload estimation and resource provisioning.SLOptfurther implements an adaptive batch drop policy to mitigate latency amplification issues within the pipeline. These innovations enableSLOptto reduce the 99th percentile latency (P99 latency) by 1.4 to 2.5 times compared to the state of the arts while lowering serving costs by up to 29%. Moreover, to achieve comparable P99 latency,SLOptrequires up to 70% less cost than existing systems. Extensive evaluations on a 64-GPU cluster demonstrateSLOpt’s effectiveness in meeting strict P99 latency SLOs under diverse real-world workloads. Yitao Hu, Guotao Yang, Ziqi Gong, Laiping Zhao, Wenxin Li 0001, Xiulong Liu 0001, Wenyu Qu |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 3 |
| 2017 | Hainan Coherent Scatter Phased Array Radar (HCOPAR): System Design and Ionospheric Irregularity ObservationsabstractThe Hainan coherent scatter phased array radar (HCOPAR) is one of the most important radio systems of the Chinese Meridian Space Weather Monitoring Project (Meridian Project). The radar is located at Fuke station (19.5°N, 109.1°E, dip latitude 8.1°N), Hainan island, China, to observe the field-aligned irregularities in ionospheric E- and F-regions. It is operated with a peak power of 54 kW and uses the Barker codes for good sensitivity. Its antenna array is composed of 18×4 five-element Yagi antennas and is used for both transmitting and receiving. The Yagi antennas are arranged in a rectangular grid 100 m long and 20 m wide, covering an area of 2000 m2. This antenna arrangement forms seven radar beams from -22.5° to 22.5° in azimuth with an angle step of 7.5°. The central beam points to due geographic north. A brief description of the radar system, data processing, and signal characteristics is also provided. The intensity, Doppler velocities, and spectral widths of the quasi-periodic echoes measured in the nighttime of June 23, 2013 are presented as typical data of type II irregularities in the E-region. The data recorded by the HCOPAR in the fan-beam mode on September 15, 2013 are displayed as the typical F-region plasma bubbles. Gang Chen 0026, Jing-Ye Yan, Shao-Dong Zhang, Chunxiao Yan, Guotao Yang, Ai-Lan Lan, Wanlin Gong, Lei Qiao 0003, Jin Wang 0004 |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 7 |