VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacob Dunefsky
dblp:281/2129
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 89% Language models and text generation · 11% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuits · NeurIPS 2024 Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuits · NeurIPS 2024 Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias in language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
circuit analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuits · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in Transformers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuits · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transcoder · 0.8sparse autoencoder · 0.8observable propagation · 0.8linear functional analysis · 0.8coupling coefficient · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Observable Propagation: Uncovering Feature Vectors in TransformersabstractA key goal of current mechanistic interpretability research in NLP is to find *linear features* (also called "feature vectors") for transformers: directions in activation space corresponding to concepts that are used by a given model in its computation. Present state-of-the-art methods for finding linear features require large amounts of labelled data -- both laborious to acquire and computationally expensive to utilize. In this work, we introduce a novel method, called "observable propagation" (in short: ObProp), for finding linear features used by transformer language models in computing a given task -- *using almost no data*. Our paradigm centers on the concept of "observables", linear functionals corresponding to given tasks. We then introduce a mathematical theory for the analysis of feature vectors, including a similarity metric between feature vectors called the *coupling coefficient* which estimates the degree to which one feature's output correlates with another's. We use ObProp to perform extensive qualitative investigations into several tasks, including gendered occupational bias, political party prediction, and programming language detection. Our results suggest that ObProp surpasses traditional approaches for finding feature vectors in the low-data regime, and that ObProp can be used to better understand the mechanisms responsible for bias in large language models. Jacob Dunefsky, Arman Cohan |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuitsabstractA key goal in mechanistic interpretability is circuit analysis: finding sparse subgraphs of models corresponding to specific behaviors or capabilities. However, MLP sublayers make fine-grained circuit analysis on transformer-based language models difficult. In particular, interpretable features—such as those found by sparse autoencoders (SAEs)—are typically linear combinations of extremely many neurons, each with its own nonlinearity to account for. Circuit analysis in this setting thus either yields intractably large circuits or fails to disentangle local and global behavior. To address this we explore **transcoders**, which seek to faithfully approximate a densely activating MLP layer with a wider, sparsely-activating MLP layer. We introduce a novel method for using transcoders to perform weights-based circuit analysis through MLP sublayers. The resulting circuits neatly factorize into input-dependent and input-invariant terms. We then successfully train transcoders on language models with 120M, 410M, and 1.4B parameters, and find them to perform at least on par with SAEs in terms of sparsity, faithfulness, and human-interpretability. Finally, we apply transcoders to reverse-engineer unknown circuits in the model, and we obtain novel insights regarding the "greater-than circuit" in GPT2-small. Our results suggest that transcoders can prove effective in decomposing model computations involving MLPs into interpretable circuits. Code is available at https://github.com/jacobdunefsky/transcoder_circuits/ Jacob Dunefsky, Philippe Chlenski, Neel Nanda |
NeurIPS | 1 |