VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Durga Sivasubramanian
dblp:281/8093
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Optimization for machine learning · 14% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
1.5 | 3 | 2021 | Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization Error · ICML 2021 GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Training · ICML 2021 GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data subset selection |
1.5 | 3 | 2021 | Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization Error · ICML 2021 GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Training · ICML 2021 GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 2 | 2023 | Adaptive Mixing of Auxiliary Losses in Supervised Learning · AAAI 2023 Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
auxiliary loss |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Mixing of Auxiliary Losses in Supervised Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Mixing of Auxiliary Losses in Supervised Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
gradient matching |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Training · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization Error · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
submodular optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization Error · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
discrete-continuous optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Mixing of Auxiliary Losses in Supervised Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
label noise robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
submodular optimization · 1.2bi-level optimization · 1.2meta-learning · 0.7matroid constraints · 0.7discrete-continuous optimization · 0.7orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.5gradient matching · 0.5duality · 0.5approximation guarantees · 0.5active learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Gradient Coreset for Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning (FL) is used to learn machine learning models with data that is partitioned across multiple clients, including resource-constrained edge devices. It is therefore important to devise solutions that are efficient in terms of compute, communication, and energy consumption, while ensuring compliance with the FL framework’s privacy requirements. Conventional approaches to these problems select a weighted subset of the training dataset, known as coreset, and learn by fitting models on it. Such coreset selection approaches are also known to be robust to data noise. However, these approaches rely on the overall statistics of the training data and are not easily extendable to the FL setup.In this paper, we propose an algorithm called Gradient based Coreset for Robust and Efficient Federated Learning (Gcfl) that selects a coreset at each client, only every K communication rounds and derives updates only from it, assuming the availability of a small validation dataset at the server. We demonstrate that our coreset selection technique is highly effective in accounting for noise in clients’ data. We conduct experiments using four real-world datasets and show that Gcfl is (1) more compute and energy efficient than FL, (2) robust to various kinds of noise in both the feature space and labels, (3) preserves the privacy of the validation dataset, and (4) introduces a small communication overhead but achieves significant gains in performance, particularly in cases when the clients’ data is noisy. Durga Sivasubramanian, Lokesh Nagalapatti, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Ganesh Ramakrishnan |
WACV | 1 |
| 2024 | Using Early Readouts to Mediate Featural Bias in DistillationabstractDeep networks tend to learn spurious feature-label correlations in real-world supervised learning tasks. This vulnerability is aggravated in distillation, where a student model may have lesser representational capacity than the corresponding teacher model. Often, knowledge of specific spurious correlations is used to reweight instances & rebalance the learning process. We propose a novel early readout mechanism whereby we attempt to predict the label using representations from earlier network layers. We show that these early readouts automatically identify problem instances or groups in the form of confident, incorrect predictions. Leveraging these signals to modulate the distillation loss on an instance level allows us to substantially improve not only group fairness measures across benchmark datasets, but also overall accuracy of the student model. We also provide secondary analyses that bring insight into the role of feature learning in supervision and distillation. Rishabh Tiwari, Durga Sivasubramanian, Anmol Reddy Mekala, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Pradeep Shenoy |
WACV | 2 |
| 2023 | Adaptive Mixing of Auxiliary Losses in Supervised LearningabstractIn many supervised learning scenarios, auxiliary losses are used in order to introduce additional information or constraints into the supervised learning objective. For instance, knowledge distillation aims to mimic outputs of a powerful teacher model; similarly, in rule-based approaches, weak labeling information is provided by labeling functions which may be noisy rule-based approximations to true labels. We tackle the problem of learning to combine these losses in a principled manner. Our proposal, AMAL, uses a bi-level optimization criterion on validation data to learn optimal mixing weights, at an instance-level, over the training data. We describe a meta-learning approach towards solving this bi-level objective, and show how it can be applied to different scenarios in supervised learning. Experiments in a number of knowledge distillation and rule denoising domains show that AMAL provides noticeable gains over competitive baselines in those domains. We empirically analyze our method and share insights into the mechanisms through which it provides performance gains. The code for AMAL is at: https://github.com/durgas16/AMAL.git. Durga Sivasubramanian, Ayush Maheshwari, Prathosh A. P., Pradeep Shenoy, Ganesh Ramakrishnan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture ModelsabstractWe study a new framework of learning mixture models via automatic clustering called PRESTO, wherein we optimize a joint objective function on the model parameters and the partitioning, with each model tailored to perform well on its specific cluster. In contrast to prior work, we do not assume any generative model for the data. We convert our training problem to a joint parameter estimation cum a subset selection problem, subject to a matroid span constraint. This allows us to reduce our problem into a constrained set function minimization problem, where the underlying objective is monotone and approximately submodular. We then propose a new joint discrete-continuous optimization algorithm that achieves a bounded approximation guarantee for our problem. We show that PRESTO outperforms several alternative methods. Finally, we study PRESTO in the context of resource-efficient deep learning, where we train smaller resource-constrained models on each partition and show that it outperforms existing data partitioning and model pruning/knowledge distillation approaches, which in contrast to PRESTO, require large initial (teacher) models. Parth Vipul Sangani, Arjun Shashank Kashettiwar, Pritish Chakraborty, Bhuvan Reddy Gangula, Durga Sivasubramanian, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Abir De |
ICML | 5 |
| 2021 | GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust LearningabstractLarge scale machine learning and deep models are extremely data-hungry. Unfortunately, obtaining large amounts of labeled data is expensive, and training state-of-the-art models (with hyperparameter tuning) requires significant computing resources and time. Secondly, real-world data is noisy and imbalanced. As a result, several recent papers try to make the training process more efficient and robust. However, most existing work either focuses on robustness or efficiency, but not both. In this work, we introduce GLISTER, a GeneraLIzation based data Subset selecTion for Efficient and Robust learning framework. We formulate GLISTER as a mixed discrete-continuous bi-level optimization problem to select a subset of the training data, which maximizes the log-likelihood on a held-out validation set. We then analyze GLISTER for simple classifiers such as gaussian and multinomial naive-bayes, k-nearest neighbor classifier, and linear regression and show connections to submodularity. Next, we propose an iterative online algorithm GLISTER-ONLINE, which performs data selection iteratively along with the parameter updates, and can be applied to any loss-based learning algorithm. We then show that for a rich class of loss functions including cross-entropy, hinge-loss, squared-loss, and logistic-loss, the inner discrete data selection is an instance of (weakly) submodular optimization, and we analyze conditions for which GLISTER-ONLINE reduces the validation loss and converges. Finally, we propose GLISTER-ACTIVE, an extension to batch active learning, and we empirically demonstrate the performance of GLISTER on a wide range of tasks including, (a) data selection to reduce training time, (b) robust learning under label noise and imbalance settings, and (c) batch-active learning with a number of deep and shallow models. We show that our framework improves upon the state of the art both in efficiency and accuracy (in cases (a) and (c)) and is more efficient compared to other state-of-the-art robust learning algorithms in case (b). The code for GLISTER is at: https://github.com/dssresearch/GLISTER. KrishnaTeja Killamsetty, Durga Sivasubramanian, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Rishabh Iyer 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2021 | GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model TrainingabstractThe great success of modern machine learning models on large datasets is contingent on extensive computational resources with high financial and environmental costs. One way to address this is by extracting subsets that generalize on par with the full data. In this work, we propose a general framework, GRAD-MATCH, which finds subsets that closely match the gradient of the \emph{training or validation} set. We find such subsets effectively using an orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. We show rigorous theoretical and convergence guarantees of the proposed algorithm and, through our extensive experiments on real-world datasets, show the effectiveness of our proposed framework. We show that GRAD-MATCH significantly and consistently outperforms several recent data-selection algorithms and achieves the best accuracy-efficiency trade-off. GRAD-MATCH is available as a part of the CORDS toolkit: \url{https://github.com/decile-team/cords}. KrishnaTeja Killamsetty, Durga Sivasubramanian, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Abir De, Rishabh Iyer 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization ErrorabstractData subset selection from a large number of training instances has been a successful approach toward efficient and cost-effective machine learning. However, models trained on a smaller subset may show poor generalization ability. In this paper, our goal is to design an algorithm for selecting a subset of the training data, so that the model can be trained quickly, without significantly sacrificing on accuracy. More specifically, we focus on data subset selection for $L_2$ regularized regression problems and provide a novel problem formulation which seeks to minimize the training loss with respect to both the trainable parameters and the subset of training data, subject to error bounds on the validation set. We tackle this problem using several technical innovations. First, we represent this problem with simplified constraints using the dual of the original training problem and show that the objective of this new representation is a monotone and $\alpha$-submodular function, for a wide variety of modeling choices. Such properties lead us to develop SELCON, an efficient majorization-minimization algorithm for data subset selection, that admits an approximation guarantee even when the training provides an imperfect estimate of the trained model. Finally, our experiments on several datasets show that SELCON trades off accuracy and efficiency more effectively than the current state-of-the-art. Durga Sivasubramanian, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Abir De |
ICML | 1 |