VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Samarinas
dblp:281/9543 · also Christos Samarinas
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1941-3310ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
conversational information seeking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › adaptive retrieval
proactive retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection construction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval
document retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations · SIGIR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
depth-k pooling · 0.8crowdsourcing · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in ConversationsabstractThe field of conversational information seeking, which is rapidly gaining interest in both academia and industry, is changing how we interact with search engines through natural language interactions. Existing datasets and methods are mostly evaluating reactive conversational information seeking systems that solely provide response to every query from the user. We identify a gap in building and evaluating proactive conversational information seeking systems that can monitor a multi-party human conversation and proactively engage in the conversation at an opportune moment by retrieving useful resources and suggestions. In this paper, we introduce a large-scale dataset for proactive document retrieval that consists of over 2.8 million conversations. We conduct crowdsourcing experiments to obtain high-quality and relatively complete relevance judgments through depth-k pooling. We also collect annotations related to the parts of the conversation that are related to each document, enabling us to evaluate proactive retrieval systems. We introduce normalized proactive discounted cumulative gain (npDCG) for evaluating these systems, and further provide benchmark results for a wide range of models, including a novel model we developed for this task. We believe that the developed dataset, called ProCIS, paves the path towards developing proactive conversational information seeking systems. Chris Samarinas, Hamed Zamani |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2020 | Latent Retrieval for Large-Scale Fact-Checking and Question Answering with NLI trainingabstractPassage retrieval is a part of fact-checking and question answering systems that is critical yet often neglected. Most systems usually rely only on traditional sparse retrieval. This can have a significant impact on the recall, especially when the relevant passages have few overlapping words with the query sentence. Recent approaches have attempted to learn dense representations of queries and passages to better capture the latent semantic content of text. While dense retrieval models have been proven effective in question answering, there is no relevant work for improving evidence retrieval in fact-checking. In this work, we show that training a dense retriever is sufficient to outperform traditional sparse representations in both question answering and fact-checking. We constructed a new dataset called Factual-NLI, comprised of factual claims and their supporting evidence, and demonstrate that using it to train a dense retriever can improve evidence retrieval significantly. Experimental results on the MSMARCO dataset indicate that pre-training with Factual-NLI, and other NLI datasets, is also effective for large-scale passage retrieval in question answering. Our model is incorporated in a real world semantic search engine that returns snippets containing evidence related to questions and claims about the COVID-19 pandemic. Chris Samarinas, Wynne Hsu, Mong-Li Lee |
ICTAI | 1 |