Ruqi Bai

dblp:281/9947 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 54% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model
0.812024
Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals for Invertible Latent Causal Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.812024
Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals for Invertible Latent Causal Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › causal fairness
counterfactual fairness
0.812024
Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.812024
Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness trade-off
fairness-accuracy trade-off
0.812024
Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated transfer learning
federated domain generalization
0.812024
Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.812024
Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals for Invertible Latent Causal Models · ICLR 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.812024
Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.212024
Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

excess risk analysis · 0.8doubly robust estimation · 0.8domain translation · 0.8autoregressive generative model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Benchmarking Algorithms for Federated Domain Generalization
abstract
While prior federated learning (FL) methods mainly consider client heterogeneity, we focus on the *Federated Domain Generalization (DG)* task, which introduces train-test heterogeneity in the FL context. Existing evaluations in this field are limited in terms of the scale of the clients and dataset diversity. Thus, we propose a Federated DG benchmark that aim to test the limits of current methods with high client heterogeneity, large numbers of clients, and diverse datasets. Towards this objective, we introduce a novel data partition method that allows us to distribute any domain dataset among few or many clients while controlling client heterogeneity. We then introduce and apply our methodology to evaluate 14 DG methods, which include centralized DG methods adapted to the FL context, FL methods that handle client heterogeneity, and methods designed specifically for Federated DG on 7 datasets. Our results suggest that, despite some progress, significant performance gaps remain in Federated DG, especially when evaluating with a large number of clients, high client heterogeneity, or more realistic datasets. Furthermore, our extendable benchmark code will be publicly released to aid in benchmarking future Federated DG approaches.
Ruqi Bai, Saurabh Bagchi, David I. Inouye
ICLR1
2024 Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals for Invertible Latent Causal Models
abstract
Answering counterfactual queries has important applications such as explainability, robustness, and fairness but is challenging when the causal variables are unobserved and the observations are non-linear mixtures of these latent variables, such as pixels in images. One approach is to recover the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM), which may be infeasible in practice due to requiring strong assumptions, e.g., linearity of the causal mechanisms or perfect atomic interventions. Meanwhile, more practical ML-based approaches using naive domain translation models to generate counterfactual samples lack theoretical grounding and may construct invalid counterfactuals. In this work, we strive to strike a balance between practicality and theoretical guarantees by analyzing a specific type of causal query called *domain counterfactuals*, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain (or environment). We show that recovering the latent SCM is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals, thereby sidestepping some of the theoretic challenges. By assuming invertibility and sparsity of intervention, we prove domain counterfactual estimation error can be bounded by a data fit term and intervention sparsity term. Building upon our theoretical results, we develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation under autoregressive and shared parameter constraints that enforce intervention sparsity. Finally, we show an improvement in counterfactual estimation over baseline methods through extensive simulated and image-based experiments.
Ruqi Bai, Sean Kulinski, Murat Kocaoglu, David I. Inouye
ICLR2
2024 Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions
abstract
In high-stakes domains such as healthcare and hiring, the role of machine learning (ML) in decision-making raises significant fairness concerns. This work focuses on Counterfactual Fairness (CF), which posits that an ML model's outcome on any individual should remain unchanged if they had belonged to a different demographic group. Previous works have proposed methods that guarantee CF. Notwithstanding, their effects on the model's predictive performance remain largely unclear. To fill this gap, we provide a theoretical study on the inherent trade-off between CF and predictive performance in a model-agnostic manner. We first propose a simple but effective method to cast an optimal but potentially unfair predictor into a fair one with a minimal loss of performance. By analyzing the excess risk incurred by perfect CF, we quantify this inherent trade-off. Further analysis on our method's performance with access to only incomplete causal knowledge is also conducted. Built upon this, we propose a practical algorithm that can be applied in such scenarios. Experiments on both synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets demonstrate the validity of our analysis and methods.
Tianci Liu 0003, Ruqi Bai, Jing Gao 0004, Murat Kocaoglu, David I. Inouye
NeurIPS3