Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qingqiang Chen

dblp:282/2550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.812024
Efficient Classification by Removing Bayesian Confusing Samples · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › classification error analysis
bayes error estimation
0.712023
Evaluating Classification Model Against Bayes Error Rate · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › classification theory
bayes error rate
0.712023
Evaluating Classification Model Against Bayes Error Rate · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels
0.712023
Evaluating Classification Model Against Bayes Error Rate · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Data mining › data reduction
instance selection
0.612022
Instance Selection: A Bayesian Decision Theory Perspective · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian decision theory
0.212022
Instance Selection: A Bayesian Decision Theory Perspective · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

percolation theory · 2.6k-nearest neighbour · 1.1k-means · 1.1bayesian decision theory · 0.8label propagation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 An efficient Bayes error rate estimation method
Qingqiang Chen, Fuyuan Cao, Jiye Liang
Mach. Learn.1
2024 A general elevating framework for label noise filters
Qingqiang Chen, Gaoxia Jiang, Fuyuan Cao, Changqian Men, Wenjian Wang 0001
Pattern Recognit.1
2024 Efficient Classification by Removing Bayesian Confusing Samples
abstract
Improving the generalization performance of classifiers from data pre-processing perspective has recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community. Although many methods have been proposed in the past decades, most of them lack theoretical foundations and cannot guarantee better generalization performance of classifiers on processed datasets. To overcome this flaw, in this paper, we propose a method, which is supported by Bayesian decision theory and percolation theory, to improve generalization performance by removing Bayesian confusing samples (abbr. BCS). Specifically, for a training set, we define the samples that misclassified by the Bayesian optimal classifier as BCS and prove that a classifier trained on the training set after removing BCS can obtain better generalization performance. To find out BCS, we indicate that BCS can be identified according to the size of global homogeneous cluster, a set of samples with the same labels, based on percolation theory. Based on these analysis, we propose a method to construct global homogeneous clusters and remove BCS from the training set. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method is effective for a number of classical and state-of-the-art classifiers.
Fuyuan Cao, Qingqiang Chen, Jiye Liang
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2023 Recognition of expiry data on food packages based on improved DBNet
abstract
To prevent products with missing character information from reaching the market, manufacturers need an automatic character recognition method.One of the key problems of this recognition method is to recognise text under complex package patterns.In addition, some products use dot matrix characters to reduce printing costs, which makes text extraction more difficult.We propose a character detection algorithm using DBNet as the base network, combined with the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) to improve its feature extraction of characters in complex contexts.After the character area has been located by the detection algorithm, it is intercepted and fed into a fully convolutional character recognition network to achieve print character recognition.We use ResNet as the backbone network and CTC loss for training.In addition, the CBAM module was added to the backbone network to enhance its recognition of dot matrix characters.The algorithm was finally deployed on the jetson nano.The experimental results show that the character detection accuracy reaches 97.9%, an improvement of 1.9% compared to the original network.As for the character recognition algorithm, the inference speed is doubled when deployed to the nano platform compared to the CRNN network, with an accuracy of 97.8%.
Jishi Zheng, Zhigang Ding, Linghua Kong, Qingqiang Chen
Connect. Sci.5
2023 Evaluating Classification Model Against Bayes Error Rate
abstract
For a classification task, we usually select an appropriate classifier via model selection. How to evaluate whether the chosen classifier is optimal? One can answer this question via Bayes error rate (BER). Unfortunately, estimating BER is a fundamental conundrum. Most existing BER estimators focus on giving the upper and lower bounds of the BER. However, evaluating whether the selected classifier is optimal based on these bounds is hard. In this article, we aim to learn the exact BER instead of bounds on BER. The core of our method is to transform the BER calculation problem into a noise recognition problem. Specifically, we define a type of noise called Bayes noise and prove that the proportion of Bayes noisy samples in a data set is statistically consistent with the BER of the data set. To recognize the Bayes noisy samples, we present a method consisting of two parts: selecting reliable samples based on percolation theory and then employing a label propagation algorithm to recognize the Bayes noisy samples based on the selected reliable samples. The superiority of the proposed method compared to the existing BER estimators is verified on extensive synthetic, benchmark, and image data sets.
Qingqiang Chen, Fuyuan Cao, Jiye Liang
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2022 Instance Selection: A Bayesian Decision Theory Perspective
abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of lacking theoretical foundation and low execution efficiency of the instance selection methods based on the k-nearest neighbour rule when processing large-scale data. We point out that the core idea of these methods can be explained from the perspective of Bayesian decision theory, that is, to find which instances are reducible, irreducible, and deleterious. Then, based on the percolation theory, we establish the relationship between these three types of instances and local homogeneous cluster (i.e., a set of instances with the same labels). Finally, we propose a method based on an accelerated k-means algorithm to construct local homogeneous clusters and remove the superfluous instances. The performance of our method is studied on extensive synthetic and benchmark data sets. Our proposed method can handle large-scale data more effectively than the state-of-the-art instance selection methods. All code and data results are available at https://github.com/CQQXY161120/Instance-Selection.
Qingqiang Chen, Fuyuan Cao, Jiye Liang
AAAI1