Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu-Yan Xu
dblp:282/4116
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 85% Image recognition and object detection · 10% Trustworthy machine learning · 3% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Demonstration Tracing: Learning Generalizable Imitator Policy for Runtime Imitation from a Single Demonstration · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Demonstration Tracing: Learning Generalizable Imitator Policy for Runtime Imitation from a Single Demonstration · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › few-shot imitation learning
one-shot imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Demonstration Tracing: Learning Generalizable Imitator Policy for Runtime Imitation from a Single Demonstration · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition with Partial Label Learning · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
online reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition with Partial Label Learning · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition with Partial Label Learning · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
policy optimization · 0.9any-step dynamics model · 0.9meta-reinforcement learning · 0.8demonstration transformer · 0.8top-k recall optimization · 0.6deep descriptor transformation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractModel-based methods in reinforcement learning offer a promising approach to enhance data efficiency by facilitating policy exploration within a dynamics model. However, accurately predicting sequential steps in the dynamics model remains a challenge due to the bootstrapping prediction, which attributes the next state to the prediction of the current state. This leads to accumulated errors during model roll-out. In this paper, we propose the Any-step Dynamics Model (ADM) to mitigate the compounding error by reducing bootstrapping prediction to direct prediction. ADM allows for the use of variable-length plans as inputs for predicting future states without frequent bootstrapping. We design two algorithms, ADMPO-ON and ADMPO-OFF, which apply ADM in online and offline model-based frameworks, respectively. In the online setting, ADMPO-ON demonstrates improved sample efficiency compared to previous state-of-the-art methods. In the offline setting, ADMPO-OFF not only demonstrates superior performance compared to recent state-of-the-art offline approaches but also offers better quantification of model uncertainty using only a single ADM. Haoxin Lin, Yu-Yan Xu, Yi-Chen Li 0001, Chengxing Jia, Junyin Ye, Yang Yu 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | A latent-coupled neural network for multiphysics long-term forecasting in reactor transients using sparse observations
Yu-Yan Xu, Guanghui Yuan, Minxiao Zhong, Helin Gong |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2024 | Deep Demonstration Tracing: Learning Generalizable Imitator Policy for Runtime Imitation from a Single DemonstrationabstractOne-shot imitation learning (OSIL) is to learn an imitator agent that can execute multiple tasks with only a single demonstration. In real-world scenario, the environment is dynamic, e.g., unexpected changes can occur after demonstration. Thus, achieving generalization of the imitator agent is crucial as agents would inevitably face situations unseen in the provided demonstrations. While traditional OSIL methods excel in relatively stationary settings, their adaptability to such unforeseen changes, which asking for a higher level of generalization ability for the imitator agents, is limited and rarely discussed. In this work, we present a new algorithm called Deep Demonstration Tracing (DDT). In DDT, we propose a demonstration transformer architecture to encourage agents to adaptively trace suitable states in demonstrations. Besides, it integrates OSIL into a meta-reinforcement-learning training paradigm, providing regularization for policies in unexpected situations. We evaluate DDT on a new navigation task suite and robotics tasks, demonstrating its superior performance over existing OSIL methods across all evaluated tasks in dynamic environments with unforeseen changes. The project page is in https://osil-ddt.github.io. Xiong-Hui Chen, Junyin Ye, Hang Zhao 0018, Yi-Chen Li 0001, XuHui Liu, Yu-Yan Xu, Zhihao Ye, Si-Hang Yang, Yang Yu 0001, Kai Xu 0004, Zongzhang Zhang |
ICML | 7 |
| 2022 | Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition with Partial Label LearningabstractThe task of webly-supervised fine-grained recognition is to boost recognition accuracy of classifying subordinate categories (e.g., different bird species) by utilizing freely available but noisy web data. As the label noises significantly hurt the network training, it is desirable to distinguish and eliminate noisy images. In this paper, we propose two strategies, i.e., open-set noise removal and closed-set noise correction, to both remove such two kinds of web noises w.r.t. fine-grained recognition. Specifically, for open-set noise removal, we utilize a pre-trained deep model to perform deep descriptor transformation to estimate the positive correlation between these web images, and detect the open-set noises based on the correlation values. Regarding closed-set noise correction, we develop a top-k recall optimization loss for firstly assigning a label set towards each web image to reduce the impact of hard label assignment for closed-set noises. Then, we further propose to correct the sample with its label set as the true single label from a partial label learning perspective. Experiments on several webly-supervised fine-grained benchmark datasets show that our method obviously outperforms other existing state-of-the-art methods. Yu-Yan Xu, Yang Shen 0006, Xiu-Shen Wei, Jian Yang 0003 |
IJCAI | 1 |