Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linfan Zhang

dblp:282/4194 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Vision and language · 33% Graph learning · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.912025
Value-Spectrum: Quantifying Preferences of Vision-Language Models via Value Decomposition in Social Media Contexts · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering
0.512021
Label consistency in overfitted generalized $k$-means · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
k-means
0.512021
Label consistency in overfitted generalized $k$-means · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
label consistency
0.512021
Label consistency in overfitted generalized $k$-means · NeurIPS 2021
Data mining
clustering
0.512021
Label consistency in overfitted generalized $k$-means · NeurIPS 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents › role-playing agents
persona simulation
0.312025
Value-Spectrum: Quantifying Preferences of Vision-Language Models via Value Decomposition in Social Media Contexts · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

manifold clustering · 1.0approximation guarantees · 1.0visual question answering benchmark · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Value-Spectrum: Quantifying Preferences of Vision-Language Models via Value Decomposition in Social Media Contexts
abstract
The recent progress in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has broadened the scope of multimodal applications. However, evaluations often remain limited to functional tasks, neglecting abstract dimensions such as personality traits and human values. To address this gap, we introduce Value-Spectrum, a novel Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark aimed at assessing VLMs based on Schwartz’s value dimensions that capture core human values guiding people’s preferences and actions. We design a VLM agent pipeline to simulate video browsing and construct a vector database comprising over 50,000 short videos from TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram Reels. These videos span multiple months and cover diverse topics, including family, health, hobbies, society, technology, etc. Benchmarking on Value-Spectrum highlights notable variations in how VLMs handle value-oriented content. Beyond identifying VLMs’ intrinsic preferences, we also explore the ability of VLM agents to adopt specific personas when explicitly prompted, revealing insights into the adaptability of the model in role-playing scenarios. These findings highlight the potential of Value-Spectrum as a comprehensive evaluation set for tracking VLM preferences in value-based tasks and abilities to simulate diverse personas. The complete code and data are available at https://github.com/Jeremyyny/Value-Spectrum.
Shengqi Yang, Linfan Zhang, Ying Nian Wu
ACL (1)4
2021 Label consistency in overfitted generalized $k$-means
abstract
We provide theoretical guarantees for label consistency in generalized $k$-means problems, with an emphasis on the overfitted case where the number of clusters used by the algorithm is more than the ground truth. We provide conditions under which the estimated labels are close to a refinement of the true cluster labels. We consider both exact and approximate recovery of the labels. Our results hold for any constant-factor approximation to the $k$-means problem. The results are also model-free and only based on bounds on the maximum or average distance of the data points to the true cluster centers. These centers themselves are loosely defined and can be taken to be any set of points for which the aforementioned distances can be controlled. We show the usefulness of the results with applications to some manifold clustering problems.
Linfan Zhang, Arash A. Amini
NeurIPS1