VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Novikov 0001
dblp:282/6085-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 Critic Regularized Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Tensorizing Neural Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluation · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
critic regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Critic Regularized Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Critic Regularized Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Critic Regularized Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition › tensor decomposition
tensor train decomposition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Expressive power of recurrent neural networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Expressive power of recurrent neural networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › low-rank approximation
tensor-train decomposition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Tensorizing Neural Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor Train · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor Train · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor Train · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor Train · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor Train · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
automatic differentiation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design
fully-connected layer |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Tensorizing Neural Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7riemannian optimization · 0.9automatic differentiation · 0.9tensor-train decomposition · 0.8off-policy evaluation · 0.5tensor train decomposition · 0.4regression · 0.4critic-regularized regression · 0.4linear algebra operations · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal BehaviorabstractSymbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist.
Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior.
We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each.
The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition. Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld |
ICML | 12 |
| 2021 | Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluation
Justin Fu, Mohammad Norouzi 0002, Ofir Nachum, George Tucker, Ziyu Wang 0001, Alexander Novikov 0001, Sherry Yang 0001, Michael R. Zhang, Yutian Chen 0001, Aviral Kumar, Cosmin Paduraru, Sergey Levine, Tom Le Paine |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2020 | Critic Regularized RegressionabstractOffline reinforcement learning (RL), also known as batch RL, offers the prospect of policy optimization from large pre-recorded datasets without online environment interaction. It addresses challenges with regard to the cost of data collection and safety, both of which are particularly pertinent to real-world applications of RL. Unfortunately, most off-policy algorithms perform poorly when learning from a fixed dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel offline RL algorithm to learn policies from data using a form of critic-regularized regression (CRR). We find that CRR performs surprisingly well and scales to tasks with high-dimensional state and action spaces -- outperforming several state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms by a significant margin on a wide range of benchmark tasks. Ziyu Wang 0001, Alexander Novikov 0001, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Scott E. Reed, Bobak Shahriari, Noah Y. Siegel, Caglar Gulcehre, Nicolas Heess, Nando de Freitas |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Caglar Gulcehre, Ziyu Wang 0001, Alexander Novikov 0001, Thomas Paine, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Konrad Zolna, Rishabh Agarwal, Josh Merel, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Cosmin Paduraru, Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, Mohammad Norouzi 0002, Matt Hoffman 0001, Nicolas Heess, Nando de Freitas |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F)abstractTensor Train decomposition is used across many branches of machine learning. We present T3F—a library for Tensor Train decomposition based on TensorFlow. T3F supports GPU execution, batch processing, automatic differentiation, and versatile functionality for the Riemannian optimization framework, which takes into account the underlying manifold structure to construct efficient optimization methods. The library makes it easier to implement machine learning papers that rely on the Tensor Train decomposition. T3F includes documentation, examples and 94% test coverage. Alexander Novikov 0001, Pavel Izmailov, Valentin Khrulkov, Michael Figurnov, Ivan V. Oseledets |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2018 | Scalable Gaussian Processes with Billions of Inducing Inputs via Tensor Train DecompositionabstractWe propose a method (TT-GP) for approximate inference in Gaussian Process (GP) models. We build on previous scalable GP research including stochastic variational inference based on inducing inputs, kernel interpolation, and structure exploiting algebra. The key idea of our method is to use Tensor Train decomposition for variational parameters, which allows us to train GPs with billions of inducing inputs and achieve state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks. Further, our approach allows for training kernels based on deep neural networks without any modifications to the underlying GP model. A neural network learns a multidimensional embedding for the data, which is used by the GP to make the final prediction. We train GP and neural network parameters end-to-end without pretraining, through maximization of GP marginal likelihood. We show the efficiency of the proposed approach on several regression and classification benchmark datasets including MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Airline. Pavel Izmailov, Alexander Novikov 0001, Dmitry Kropotov |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2018 | Expressive power of recurrent neural networks
Valentin Khrulkov, Alexander Novikov 0001, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2015 | Tensorizing Neural NetworksabstractDeep neural networks currently demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in several domains.At the same time, models of this class are very demanding in terms of computational resources. In particular, a large amount of memory is required by commonly used fully-connected layers, making it hard to use the models on low-end devices and stopping the further increase of the model size. In this paper we convert the dense weight matrices of the fully-connected layers to the Tensor Train format such that the number of parameters is reduced by a huge factor and at the same time the expressive power of the layer is preserved.In particular, for the Very Deep VGG networks we report the compression factor of the dense weight matrix of a fully-connected layer up to 200000 times leading to the compression factor of the whole network up to 7 times. Alexander Novikov 0001, Dmitry Podoprikhin, Anton Osokin, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Putting MRFs on a Tensor TrainabstractIn the paper we present a new framework for dealing with probabilistic graphical models. Our approach relies on the recently proposed Tensor Train format (TT-format) of a tensor that while being compact allows for efficient application of linear algebra operations. We present a way to convert the energy of a Markov random field to the TT-format and show how one can exploit the properties of the TT-format to attack the tasks of the partition function estimation and the MAP-inference. We provide theoretical guarantees on the accuracy of the proposed algorithm for estimating the partition function and compare our methods against several state-of-the-art algorithms. Alexander Novikov 0001, Anton Rodomanov, Anton Osokin, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
ICML | 1 |