Hanna Krasowski

dblp:283/0285 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6730-3802ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
action masking
0.812024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action space design
0.812024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.812024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization
0.812024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
safe control
0.212024
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy gradient · 0.8action masking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking
abstract
Continuous action spaces in reinforcement learning (RL) are commonly defined as multidimensional intervals. While intervals usually reflect the action boundaries for tasks well, they can be challenging for learning because the typically large global action space leads to frequent exploration of irrelevant actions. Yet, little task knowledge can be sufficient to identify significantly smaller state-specific sets of relevant actions. Focusing learning on these relevant actions can significantly improve training efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper, we propose to focus learning on the set of relevant actions and introduce three continuous action masking methods for exactly mapping the action space to the state-dependent set of relevant actions. Thus, our methods ensure that only relevant actions are executed, enhancing the predictability of the RL agent and enabling its use in safety-critical applications. We further derive the implications of the proposed methods on the policy gradient. Using proximal policy optimization ( PPO), we evaluate our methods on four control tasks, where the relevant action set is computed based on the system dynamics and a relevant state set. Our experiments show that the three action masking methods achieve higher final rewards and converge faster than the baseline without action masking.
Roland Stolz, Hanna Krasowski, Jakob Thumm, Michael Eichelbeck, Philipp Gassert, Matthias Althoff
NeurIPS2
2021 Temporal Logic Formalization of Marine Traffic Rules
abstract
Autonomous vessels have to adhere to marine traffic rules to ensure traffic safety and reduce the liability of manufacturers. However, autonomous systems can only evaluate rule compliance if rules are formulated in a precise and mathematical way. This paper formalizes marine traffic rules from the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) using temporal logic. In particular, the collision prevention rules between two power-driven vessels are delineated. The formulation is based on modular predicates and adjustable parameters. We evaluate the formalized rules in three US coastal areas for over 1,200 vessels using real marine traffic data.
Hanna Krasowski, Matthias Althoff
IV1