VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
N. M. Anoop Krishnan
dblp:283/4469
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Graph learning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 24% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
2.6 | 4 | 2024 | BroGNet: Momentum-Conserving Graph Neural Stochastic Differential Equation for Learning Brownian Dynamics · ICLR 2024 Enhancing the Inductive Biases of Graph Neural ODE for Modeling Physical Systems · ICLR 2023 Unravelling the Performance of Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical simulation › particle simulation
brownian dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BroGNet: Momentum-Conserving Graph Neural Stochastic Differential Equation for Learning Brownian Dynamics · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BroGNet: Momentum-Conserving Graph Neural Stochastic Differential Equation for Learning Brownian Dynamics · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiSCoMaT: Distantly Supervised Composition Extraction from Tables in Materials Science Articles · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › continuous graph neural network
graph neural ordinary differential equations |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Enhancing the Inductive Biases of Graph Neural ODE for Modeling Physical Systems · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiSCoMaT: Distantly Supervised Composition Extraction from Tables in Materials Science Articles · ACL (1) 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | StriderNet: A Graph Reinforcement Learning Approach to Optimize Atomic Structures on Rough Energy Landscapes · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | StriderNet: A Graph Reinforcement Learning Approach to Optimize Atomic Structures on Rough Energy Landscapes · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › computational physics
physics simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Enhancing the Inductive Biases of Graph Neural ODE for Modeling Physical Systems · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
deep linear networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
inductive biases |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unravelling the Performance of Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network architecture
physics-informed graph neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unravelling the Performance of Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems
dynamical system simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unravelling the Performance of Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equations · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
materials science |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DiSCoMaT: Distantly Supervised Composition Extraction from Tables in Materials Science Articles · ACL (1) 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics › multibody dynamics
rigid body dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural Network · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 2.1state space model · 1.7mamba · 1.7kernel integral formulation · 1.7momentum conservation · 1.5table parsing · 1.3inductive bias · 1.3graph neural ODE · 1.3distant supervision · 1.3stochastic differential equations · 0.8stochastic differential equation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential EquationsabstractNeural operators have emerged as powerful data-driven frameworks for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), offering significant speedups over numerical methods. However, existing neural operators struggle with scalability in high-dimensional spaces, incur high computational costs, and face challenges in capturing continuous and long-range dependencies in PDE dynamics. To address these limitations, we introduce the Latent Mamba Operator (LaMO), which integrates the efficiency of state-space models (SSMs) in latent space with the expressive power of kernel integral formulations in neural operators. We also establish a theoretical connection between state-space models (SSMs) and the kernel integral of neural operators. Extensive experiments across diverse PDE benchmarks on regular grids, structured meshes, and point clouds covering solid and fluid physics datasets, LaMOs achieve consistent state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, with a 32.3% improvement over existing baselines in solution operator approximation, highlighting its efficacy in modeling complex PDEs solution. Karn Tiwari, Niladri Dutta, N. M. Anoop Krishnan, Prathosh A. P. |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | BroGNet: Momentum-Conserving Graph Neural Stochastic Differential Equation for Learning Brownian DynamicsabstractNeural networks (NNs) that exploit strong inductive biases based on physical laws and symmetries have shown remarkable success in learning the dynamics of physical systems directly from their trajectory. However, these works focus only on the systems that follow deterministic dynamics, such as Newtonian or Hamiltonian. Here, we propose a framework, namely Brownian graph neural networks (BroGNet), combining stochastic differential equations (SDEs) and GNNs to learn Brownian dynamics directly from the trajectory. We modify the architecture of BroGNet to enforce linear momentum conservation of the system, which, in turn, provides superior performance on learning dynamics as revealed empirically. We demonstrate this approach on several systems, namely, linear spring, linear spring with binary particle types, and non-linear spring systems, all following Brownian dynamics at finite temperatures. We show that BroGNet significantly outperforms proposed baselines across all the benchmarked Brownian systems. In addition, we demonstrate zero-shot generalizability of BroGNet to simulate unseen system sizes that are two orders of magnitude larger and to different temperatures than those used during training. Finally, we show that BroGNet conserves the momentum of the system resulting in superior performance and data efficiency. Altogether, our study contributes to advancing the understanding of the intricate dynamics of Brownian motion and demonstrates the effectiveness of graph neural networks in modeling such complex systems. Suresh Bishnoi, Jayadeva, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | DiSCoMaT: Distantly Supervised Composition Extraction from Tables in Materials Science ArticlesabstractTanishq Gupta, Mohd Zaki, Devanshi Khatsuriya, Kausik Hira, N M Anoop Krishnan, Mausam -. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Tanishq Gupta, Mohd Zaki, Devanshi Khatsuriya, Kausik Hira, N. M. Anoop Krishnan, Mausam |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2023 | Enhancing the Inductive Biases of Graph Neural ODE for Modeling Physical Systems
Suresh Bishnoi, Ravinder Bhattoo, Jayadeva, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2023 | StriderNet: A Graph Reinforcement Learning Approach to Optimize Atomic Structures on Rough Energy LandscapesabstractOptimization of atomic structures presents a challenging problem, due to their highly rough and non-convex energy landscape, with wide applications in the fields of drug design, materials discovery, and mechanics. Here, we present a graph reinforcement learning approach, StriderNet, that learns a policy to displace the atoms towards low energy configurations. We evaluate the performance of StriderNet on three complex atomic systems, namely, binary Lennard-Jones particles, calcium silicate hydrates gel, and disordered silicon. We show that StriderNet outperforms all classical optimization algorithms and enables the discovery of a lower energy minimum. In addition, StriderNet exhibits a higher rate of reaching minima with energies, as confirmed by the average over multiple realizations. Finally, we show that StriderNet exhibits inductivity to unseen system sizes that are an order of magnitude different from the training system. All the codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/M3RG-IITD/StriderNET. Vaibhav Bihani, Sahil Manchanda, Srikanth Sastry, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan |
ICML | 5 |
| 2022 | Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural NetworkabstractLagrangian and Hamiltonian neural networks LNN and HNNs, respectively) encode strong inductive biases that allow them to outperform other models of physical systems significantly. However, these models have, thus far, mostly been limited to simple systems such as pendulums and springs or a single rigid body such as a gyroscope or a rigid rotor. Here, we present a Lagrangian graph neural network (LGNN) that can learn the dynamics of articulated rigid bodies by exploiting their topology. We demonstrate the performance of LGNN by learning the dynamics of ropes, chains, and trusses with the bars modeled as rigid bodies. LGNN also exhibits generalizability---LGNN trained on chains with a few segments exhibits generalizability to simulate a chain with large number of links and arbitrary link length. We also show that the LGNN can simulate unseen hybrid systems including bars and chains, on which they have not been trained on. Specifically, we show that the LGNN can be used to model the dynamics of complex real-world structures such as the stability of tensegrity structures. Finally, we discuss the non-diagonal nature of the mass matrix and its ability to generalize in complex systems. Ravinder Bhattoo, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Unravelling the Performance of Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Dynamical SystemsabstractRecently, graph neural networks have been gaining a lot of attention to simulate dynamical systems due to their inductive nature leading to zero-shot generalizability. Similarly, physics-informed inductive biases in deep-learning frameworks have been shown to give superior performance in learning the dynamics of physical systems. There is a growing volume of literature that attempts to combine these two approaches. Here, we evaluate the performance of thirteen different graph neural networks, namely, Hamiltonian and Lagrangian graph neural networks, graph neural ODE, and their variants with explicit constraints and different architectures. We briefly explain the theoretical formulation highlighting the similarities and differences in the inductive biases and graph architecture of these systems. Then, we evaluate them on spring, pendulum, and gravitational and 3D deformable solid systems to compare the performance in terms of rollout error, conserved quantities such as energy and momentum, and generalizability to unseen system sizes. Our study demonstrates that GNNs with additional inductive biases, such as explicit constraints and decoupling of kinetic and potential energies, exhibit significantly enhanced performance. Further, all the physics-informed GNNs exhibit zero-shot generalizability to system sizes an order of magnitude larger than the training system, thus providing a promising route to simulate large-scale realistic systems. Abishek Thangamuthu, Gunjan Kumar, Suresh Bishnoi, Ravinder Bhattoo, N. M. Anoop Krishnan, Sayan Ranu |
NeurIPS | 5 |