Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonie Papon
dblp:283/5524
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 50% Learning theory · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Universal Approximation Theorems for Differentiable Geometric Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Universal Approximation Theorems for Differentiable Geometric Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › nonlinear dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Universal Approximation Theorems for Differentiable Geometric Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hyperbolic feedforward networks · 1.1deep kalman filter · 1.1feedforward networks · 0.6feed-forward network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Universal Approximation Theorems for Differentiable Geometric Deep LearningabstractThis paper addresses the growing need to process non-Euclidean data, by introducing a geometric deep learning (GDL) framework for building universal feedforward-type models compatible with differentiable manifold geometries. We show that our GDL models can approximate any continuous target function uniformly on compact sets of a controlled maximum diameter. We obtain curvature-dependent lower-bounds on this maximum diameter and upper-bounds on the depth of our approximating GDL models. Conversely, we find that there is always a continuous function between any two non-degenerate compact manifolds that any "locally-defined" GDL model cannot uniformly approximate. Our last main result identifies data-dependent conditions guaranteeing that the GDL model implementing our approximation breaks "the curse of dimensionality." We find that any "real-world" (i.e. finite) dataset always satisfies our condition and, conversely, any dataset satisfies our requirement if the target function is smooth. As applications, we confirm the universal approximation capabilities of the following GDL models: Ganea et al. (2018)'s hyperbolic feedforward networks, the architecture implementing Krishnan et al. (2015)'s deep Kalman-Filter, and deep softmax classifiers. We build universal extensions/variants of: the SPD-matrix regressor of Meyer et al. (2011), and Fletcher (2003)'s Procrustean regressor. In the Euclidean setting, our results imply a quantitative version of Kidger and Lyons (2020)'s approximation theorem and a data-dependent version of Yarotsky and Zhevnerchuk (2019)'s uncursed approximation rates. Anastasis Kratsios, Leonie Papon |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |