Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mattijs Baert

dblp:283/6046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2413-5298ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.912025
Learning Task Specifications from Demonstrations as Probabilistic Automata · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › learning from demonstration
task specification learning
0.912025
Learning Task Specifications from Demonstrations as Probabilistic Automata · ICRA 2025
Automata and formal languages
probabilistic automata
0.912025
Learning Task Specifications from Demonstrations as Probabilistic Automata · ICRA 2025
Automata and formal languages › probabilistic automata
probabilistic deterministic finite automata
0.912025
Learning Task Specifications from Demonstrations as Probabilistic Automata · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sub-goal inference · 1.7PDFA learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Task Specifications from Demonstrations as Probabilistic Automata
abstract
Specifying tasks for robotic systems traditionally requires coding expertise, deep domain knowledge, and significant time investment. While learning from demonstration offers a promising alternative, existing methods often struggle with tasks of longer horizons. To address this limitation, we introduce a computationally efficient approach for learning probabilistic deterministic finite automata (PDFA) that capture task structures and expert preferences directly from demonstrations. Our approach infers sub-goals and their temporal dependencies, producing an interpretable task specification that domain experts can easily understand and adjust. We validate our method through experiments involving object manipulation tasks, showcasing how our method enables a robot arm to effectively replicate diverse expert strategies while adapting to changing conditions.
Mattijs Baert, Sam Leroux, Pieter Simoens
ICRA1
2025 Maximum causal entropy inverse constrained reinforcement learning
Mattijs Baert, Pietro Mazzaglia, Sam Leroux, Pieter Simoens
Mach. Learn.1
2023 Inverse reinforcement learning through logic constraint inference
Mattijs Baert, Sam Leroux, Pieter Simoens
Mach. Learn.1