Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiali Wei
dblp:283/7991 · also Jia-Li Wei
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 72% Language models and text generation · 28% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › image filtering › nonlinear diffusion
anisotropic diffusion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamical Threshold-Based Fractional Anisotropic Diffusion for Speckle Noise Removal · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamical Threshold-Based Fractional Anisotropic Diffusion for Speckle Noise Removal · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
speckle reduction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamical Threshold-Based Fractional Anisotropic Diffusion for Speckle Noise Removal · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
backdoor defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack defense
backdoor sample detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | One step further: evaluating interpreters using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | One step further: evaluating interpreters using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2022 |
Software testing
metamorphic testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | One step further: evaluating interpreters using metamorphic testing · ISSTA 2022 |
Software testing › mutation testing
model mutation testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Software testing
mutation testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation Testing · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model mutation testing · 2.3deep model mutation · 2.3metamorphic testing · 1.1fractional derivative · 0.9finite difference scheme · 0.9dynamic threshold · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hessian-Riemannian second-order neurodynamic approach for constrained optimization: Theory and applications
Jiali Wei, Jianxi Yang |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2025 | TACSNet: Two-stage alignment cross-modal differential sensing network for concept prediction
Yuxin Ji, Yongjun Li 0006, Zeyuan Qu, Jiali Wei, Wenhui Sun |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 4 |
| 2025 | Dynamical Threshold-Based Fractional Anisotropic Diffusion for Speckle Noise RemovalabstractThe study of effective methods for removing image speckle remains a significant challenge in image processing. In contrast to additive noise, speckle noise is a multiplicative noise whose intensity is proportional to the signal. This results in a noise distribution that exhibits a high dependence on the signal intensity throughout the image, rendering it difficult to remove. Therefore, we present a novel approach to speckle noise removal using dynamical threshold-based fractional anisotropic diffusion (named as DTFAD) in this study. The method simultaneously considers both gradient and gray scale information in the image. In addition, the fractional derivative is integrated with anisotropic diffusion in the DTFAD model, which enhances the image denoising effect to preserve the fundamental features and edges of the image. The design of a dynamic threshold function in the diffusion coefficient enables the diffusion pattern and intensity to adaptively change according to image information, thus effectively removing speckle noise. We establish the well-posedness of the DTFAD model and implement it using an explicit finite difference scheme. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the DTFAD model outperforms traditional anisotropic diffusion techniques, and achieves a superior balance between denoising performance and texture preservation. This evidence demonstrates that the DTFAD model has the potential to be applied in practical engineering. Jiali Wei, Xiaofeng Liao 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2024 | BDMMT: Backdoor Sample Detection for Language Models Through Model Mutation TestingabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) and natural language processing (NLP) systems have developed rapidly and have been widely used in various real-world fields. However, they have been shown to be vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Specifically, the adversary injects a backdoor into the model during the training phase, so that input samples with backdoor triggers are classified as the target class. Some attacks have achieved high attack success rates on the pre-trained language models (LMs), but there have yet to be effective defense methods. In this work, we propose a defense method based on deep model mutation testing. Our main justification is that backdoor samples are much more robust than clean samples if we impose random mutations on the LMs and that backdoors are generalizable. We first confirm the effectiveness of model mutation testing in detecting backdoor samples and select the most appropriate number of mutants and mutation operators. We then systematically defend against three extensively studied backdoor attack levels (i.e., char-level, word-level, and sentence-level) by detecting backdoor samples. We also make the first attempt to defend against the latest style-level backdoor attacks. We evaluate our approach on three benchmark datasets (i.e., IMDB, Yelp, and AG news) and three style transfer datasets (i.e., SST-2, Hate-speech, and AG news). The extensive experimental results demonstrate that our approach can detect backdoor samples more efficiently and accurately than the three state-of-the-art defense approaches. Jiali Wei, Ming Fan 0002, Wenjing Jiao, Wuxia Jin, Ting Liu 0002 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2023 | An optimal neural network design for fractional deep learning of logistic growth
Jiali Wei, Guo-Cheng Wu 0001, Baoqing Liu, Juan J. Nieto 0001 |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 1 |
| 2022 | One step further: evaluating interpreters using metamorphic testingabstractThe black-box nature of the Deep Neural Network (DNN) makes it difficult for people to understand why it makes a specific decision, which restricts its applications in critical tasks. Recently, many interpreters (interpretation methods) are proposed to improve the transparency of DNNs by providing relevant features in the form of a saliency map. However, different interpreters might provide different interpretation results for the same classification case, which motivates us to conduct the robustness evaluation of interpreters. Ming Fan 0002, Jiali Wei, Wuxia Jin, Zhou Xu 0003, Wenying Wei, Ting Liu 0002 |
ISSTA | 2 |