VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lorenz Feineis
dblp:284/1005
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 68% Mathematical optimization · 32% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Vision · ECCV (23) 2022 Fusion Moves for Graph Matching · ICCV 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fusion Moves for Graph Matching · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph matching algorithms · 1.1fusion moves · 0.5dual method · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Vision
Stefan Haller, Lorenz Feineis, Lisa Hutschenreiter, Florian Bernard 0001, Carsten Rother, Dagmar Kainmüller, Paul Swoboda, Bogdan Savchynskyy |
ECCV (23) | 2 |
| 2021 | Fusion Moves for Graph MatchingabstractWe contribute to approximate algorithms for the quadratic assignment problem also known as graph matching. Inspired by the success of the fusion moves technique developed for multilabel discrete Markov random fields, we investigate its applicability to graph matching. In particular, we show how fusion moves can be efficiently combined with the dedicated state-of-the-art dual methods that have recently shown superior results in computer vision and bioimaging applications. As our empirical evaluation on a wide variety of graph matching datasets suggests, fusion moves significantly improve performance of these methods in terms of speed and quality of the obtained solutions. Our method sets a new state-of-the-art with a notable margin with respect to its competitors. Lisa Hutschenreiter, Stefan Haller, Lorenz Feineis, Carsten Rother, Dagmar Kainmüller, Bogdan Savchynskyy |
ICCV | 3 |