Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorenz Feineis

dblp:284/1005 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 68% Mathematical optimization · 32%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching
1.122022
A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Vision · ECCV (23) 2022
Fusion Moves for Graph Matching · ICCV 2021
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem
0.512021
Fusion Moves for Graph Matching · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph matching algorithms · 1.1fusion moves · 0.5dual method · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Vision
Stefan Haller, Lorenz Feineis, Lisa Hutschenreiter, Florian Bernard 0001, Carsten Rother, Dagmar Kainmüller, Paul Swoboda, Bogdan Savchynskyy
ECCV (23)2
2021 Fusion Moves for Graph Matching
abstract
We contribute to approximate algorithms for the quadratic assignment problem also known as graph matching. Inspired by the success of the fusion moves technique developed for multilabel discrete Markov random fields, we investigate its applicability to graph matching. In particular, we show how fusion moves can be efficiently combined with the dedicated state-of-the-art dual methods that have recently shown superior results in computer vision and bioimaging applications. As our empirical evaluation on a wide variety of graph matching datasets suggests, fusion moves significantly improve performance of these methods in terms of speed and quality of the obtained solutions. Our method sets a new state-of-the-art with a notable margin with respect to its competitors.
Lisa Hutschenreiter, Stefan Haller, Lorenz Feineis, Carsten Rother, Dagmar Kainmüller, Bogdan Savchynskyy
ICCV3