VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Friederike Groschupp
dblp:284/8287
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 91% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
Intel SGX |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AEX-NStep: Probabilistic Interrupt Counting Attacks on Intel SGX · SP 2026 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AEX-NStep: Probabilistic Interrupt Counting Attacks on Intel SGX · SP 2026 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AEX-NStep: Probabilistic Interrupt Counting Attacks on Intel SGX · SP 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-stepping attack · 1.0probabilistic interrupt counting · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AEX-NStep: Probabilistic Interrupt Counting Attacks on Intel SGXabstractTo mitigate interrupt-based stepping attacks (notably using SGX-Step), Intel introduced AEX-Notify, an ISA extension to Intel SGX that aims to prevent deterministic single-stepping. In this work, we introduce AEX-NStep, the first interrupt counting attack on AEX Notify-enabled Enclaves. We show that deterministic single-stepping is not required for interrupt counting attacks to be practical and that, therefore, AEX-Notify does not entirely prevent such attacks. We specifically show that one of AEX-Notify's security guarantees, obfuscated forward progress, does not hold, and we introduce two new probabilistic interrupt counting attacks. We use these attacks to construct a practical ECDSA key leakage attack on an AEX-Notiy-enabled SGX enclave. Our results extend the original security analysis of AEX-Notify and inform the design of future mitigations. Nicolas Dutly, Friederike Groschupp, Ivan Puddu, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan Capkun |
SP | 2 |