Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. Tuan Nguyen
dblp:285/5086
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 26% Reinforcement learning · 21% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | FedSR: A Simple and Effective Domain Generalization Method for Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2022 Domain Invariant Representation Learning with Domain Density Transformations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
domain-invariant representation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | KL Guided Domain Adaptation · ICLR 2022 Domain Invariant Representation Learning with Domain Density Transformations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | uCAP: An Unsupervised Prompting Method for Vision-Language Models · ECCV (74) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TIPI: Test Time Adaptation with Transformation Invariance · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TIPI: Test Time Adaptation with Transformation Invariance · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TIPI: Test Time Adaptation with Transformation Invariance · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KL Guided Domain Adaptation · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated transfer learning
federated domain generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FedSR: A Simple and Effective Domain Generalization Method for Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FedSR: A Simple and Effective Domain Generalization Method for Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
pessimism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Domain Invariant Representation Learning with Domain Density Transformations · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
generalization in offline RL |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization · ICLR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompting · 0.8surrogate loss · 0.7invariance regularizer · 0.7entropy minimization · 0.7variational bound · 0.6pessimism principle · 0.6neural function approximation · 0.6l2-norm regularization · 0.6kullback-leibler divergence · 0.6conditional mutual information regularization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | uCAP: An Unsupervised Prompting Method for Vision-Language Models
A. Tuan Nguyen, Kai Sheng Tai, Bor-Chun Chen, Satya Narayan Shukla, Hanchao Yu, Philip Torr 0001, Tai-Peng Tian, Ser-Nam Lim |
ECCV (74) | 1 |
| 2023 | TIPI: Test Time Adaptation with Transformation InvarianceabstractWhen deploying a machine learning model to a new environment, we often encounter the distribution shift problem - meaning the target data distribution is different from the model's training distribution. In this paper, we assume that labels are not provided for this new domain, and that we do not store the source data (e.g., for privacy reasons). It has been shown that even small shifts in the data distribution can affect the model's performance severely. Test Time Adaptation offers a means to combat this problem, as it allows the model to adapt during test time to the new data distribution, using only unlabeled test data batches. To achieve this, the predominant approach is to optimize a surrogate loss on the test-time unlabeled target data. In particular, minimizing the prediction's entropy on target samples [34] has received much interest as it is task-agnostic and does not require altering the model's training phase (e.g., does not require adding a self-supervised task during training on the source domain). However, as the target data's batch size is often small in real-world scenarios (e.g., autonomous driving models process each few frames in real-time), we argue that this surrogate loss is not optimal since it often collapses with small batch sizes. To tackle this problem, in this paper, we propose to use an invariance regularizer as the surrogate loss during test-time adaptation, motivated by our theoretical results regarding the model's performance under input transformations. The resulting method (TIPI-Test time adaPtation with transformation Invariance) is validated with extensive experiments in various benchmarks (Cifar10-C, Cifar100-C, ImageNet-C, DIGITS, and VisDA17). Remarkably, TIPI is robust against small batch sizes (as small as 2 in our experiments), and consistently outperforms TENT [34] in all settings. Our code is released at https://github.com/atuannguyen/TIPI. A. Tuan Nguyen, Thanh Nguyen-Tang, Ser-Nam Lim, Philip Torr 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2022 | Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization
Thanh Nguyen-Tang, Sunil Gupta 0001, A. Tuan Nguyen, Svetha Venkatesh |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | KL Guided Domain Adaptation
A. Tuan Nguyen, Toan Tran 0003, Yarin Gal, Philip Torr 0001, Atilim Günes Baydin |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | FedSR: A Simple and Effective Domain Generalization Method for Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning (FL) refers to the decentralized and privacy-preserving machine learning framework in which multiple clients collaborate (with the help of a central server) to train a global model without sharing their data. However, most existing FL methods only focus on maximizing the model's performance on the source clients' data (e.g., mobile users) without considering its generalization ability to unknown target data (e.g., a new user). In this paper, we incorporate the problem of Domain Generalization (DG) into Federated Learning to tackle the aforementioned issue. However, virtually all existing DG methods require a centralized setting where data is shared across the domains, which violates the principles of decentralized FL and hence not applicable. To this end, we propose a simple yet novel representation learning framework, namely FedSR, which enables domain generalization while still respecting the decentralized and privacy-preserving natures of this FL setting. Motivated by classical machine learning algorithms, we aim to learn a simple representation of the data for better generalization. In particular, we enforce an L2-norm regularizer on the representation and a conditional mutual information (between the representation and the data given the label) regularizer to encourage the model to only learn essential information (while ignoring spurious correlations such as the background). Furthermore, we provide theoretical connections between the above two objectives and representation alignment in domain generalization. Extensive experimental results suggest that our method significantly outperforms relevant baselines in this particular problem. A. Tuan Nguyen, Philip Torr 0001, Ser-Nam Lim |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Domain Invariant Representation Learning with Domain Density TransformationsabstractDomain generalization refers to the problem where we aim to train a model on data from a set of source domains so that the model can generalize to unseen target domains. Naively training a model on the aggregate set of data (pooled from all source domains) has been shown to perform suboptimally, since the information learned by that model might be domain-specific and generalize imperfectly to target domains. To tackle this problem, a predominant domain generalization approach is to learn some domain-invariant information for the prediction task, aiming at a good generalization across domains. In this paper, we propose a theoretically grounded method to learn a domain-invariant representation by enforcing the representation network to be invariant under all transformation functions among domains. We next introduce the use of generative adversarial networks to learn such domain transformations in a possible implementation of our method in practice. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on several widely used datasets for the domain generalization problem, on all of which we achieve competitive results with state-of-the-art models. A. Tuan Nguyen, Toan Tran 0003, Yarin Gal, Atilim Günes Baydin |
NeurIPS | 1 |