VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aseem Baranwal
dblp:285/5304
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5318-6054ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Graph learning · 61% Learning theory · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
2.7 | 4 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolution |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks · ICLR 2023 Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
spectral analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › bayesian learning theory
bayes optimality |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › graph learning
node classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph Convolutions · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization error |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral analysis · 1.5contextual stochastic block model · 1.5stochastic block model · 1.2graph convolution · 1.2over-squashing analysis · 0.7mixture of gaussians · 0.7message passing · 0.7convolution · 0.7MLP · 0.7cross-entropy loss · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Analysis of Corrected Graph ConvolutionsabstractMachine learning for node classification on graphs is a prominent area driven by applications such as recommendation systems. State-of-the-art models often use multiple graph convolutions on the data, as empirical evidence suggests they can enhance performance. However, it has been shown empirically and theoretically, that too many graph convolutions can degrade performance significantly, a phenomenon known as oversmoothing. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis, based on the two-class contextual stochastic block model (CSBM), of the performance of vanilla graph convolution from which we remove the principal eigenvector to avoid oversmoothing. We perform a spectral analysis for $k$ rounds of corrected graph convolutions, and we provide results for partial and exact classification. For partial classification, we show that each round of convolution can reduce the misclassification error exponentially up to a saturation level, after which performance does not worsen. We also extend this analysis to the multi-class setting with features distributed according to a Gaussian mixture model. For exact classification, we show that the separability threshold can be improved exponentially up to $O({\log{n}}/{\log\log{n}})$ corrected convolutions. Robert Wang 0004, Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks
Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse GraphsabstractWe study the node classification problem on feature-decorated graphs in the sparse setting, i.e., when the expected degree of a node is $O(1)$ in the number of nodes, in the fixed-dimensional asymptotic regime, i.e., the dimension of the feature data is fixed while the number of nodes is large. Such graphs are typically known to be locally tree-like. We introduce a notion of Bayes optimality for node classification tasks, called asymptotic local Bayes optimality, and compute the optimal classifier according to this criterion for a fairly general statistical data model with arbitrary distributions of the node features and edge connectivity. The optimal classifier is implementable using a message-passing graph neural network architecture. We then compute the generalization error of this classifier and compare its performance against existing learning methods theoretically on a well-studied statistical model with naturally identifiable signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in the data. We find that the optimal message-passing architecture interpolates between a standard MLP in the regime of low graph signal and a typical convolution in the regime of high graph signal. Furthermore, we prove a corresponding non-asymptotic result. Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Graph Attention RetrospectiveabstractGraph-based learning is a rapidly growing sub-field of machine learning with applications in social networks, citation networks, and bioinformatics. One of the most popular models is graph attention networks. They were introduced to allow a node to aggregate information from features of neighbor nodes in a non-uniform way, in contrast to simple graph convolution which does not distinguish the neighbors of a node. In this paper, we theoretically study the behaviour of graph attention networks. We prove multiple results on the performance of the graph attention mechanism for the problem of node classification for a contextual stochastic block model. Here, the node features are obtained from a mixture of Gaussians and the edges from a stochastic block model. We show that in an "easy" regime, where the distance between the means of the Gaussians is large enough, graph attention is able to distinguish inter-class from intra-class edges. Thus it maintains the weights of important edges and significantly reduces the weights of unimportant edges. Consequently, we show that this implies perfect node classification. In the "hard" regime, we show that every attention mechanism fails to distinguish intra-class from inter-class edges. In addition, we show that graph attention convolution cannot (almost) perfectly classify the nodes even if intra-class edges could be separated from inter-class edges. Beyond perfect node classification, we provide a positive result on graph attention's robustness against structural noise in the graph. In particular, our robustness result implies that graph attention can be strictly better than both the simple graph convolution and the best linear classifier of node features. We evaluate our theoretical results on synthetic and real-world data. Kimon Fountoulakis, Amit Levi 0001, Shenghao Yang 0002, Aseem Baranwal, Aukosh Jagannath |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2021 | Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationabstractRecently there has been increased interest in semi-supervised classification in the presence of graphical information. A new class of learning models has emerged that relies, at its most basic level, on classifying the data after first applying a graph convolution. To understand the merits of this approach, we study the classification of a mixture of Gaussians, where the data corresponds to the node attributes of a stochastic block model. We show that graph convolution extends the regime in which the data is linearly separable by a factor of roughly $1/\sqrt{D}$, where $D$ is the expected degree of a node, as compared to the mixture model data on its own. Furthermore, we find that the linear classifier obtained by minimizing the cross-entropy loss after the graph convolution generalizes to out-of-distribution data where the unseen data can have different intra- and inter-class edge probabilities from the training data. Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath |
ICML | 1 |