Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Advait Gadhikar

dblp:285/5352 · also Advait Harshal Gadhikar · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 74% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 7% Learning paradigms · 7%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
2.332025
Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2025
Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewinding · ICLR 2024
Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse training
1.622025
Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2025
Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewinding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
1.422024
Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewinding · ICLR 2024
Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation
0.912025
Pay Attention to Small Weights · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.912025
Pay Attention to Small Weights · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
Pay Attention to Small Weights · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
selective parameter update
0.912025
Pay Attention to Small Weights · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse training
lottery ticket hypothesis
0.812024
Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewinding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
over-parameterization
0.712023
Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse neural network
0.712023
Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training
0.512021
Leveraging Spatial and Temporal Correlations in Sparsified Mean Estimation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.512021
Leveraging Spatial and Temporal Correlations in Sparsified Mean Estimation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.512021
Leveraging Spatial and Temporal Correlations in Sparsified Mean Estimation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization
0.312025
Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sign flip · 0.9gradient analysis · 0.9dynamic reparameterization · 0.9adaptive gradient methods · 0.9iterative magnitude pruning · 0.8lottery ticket hypothesis · 0.7logistic regression · 0.5k-means · 0.5decoding · 0.5PCA · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Sign-In to the Lottery: Reparameterizing Sparse Training
abstract
The performance gap between training sparse neural networks from scratch (PaI) and dense-to-sparse training presents a major roadblock for efficient deep learning. According to the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, PaI hinges on finding a problem specific parameter initialization. As we show, to this end, determining correct parameter signs is sufficient. Yet, they remain elusive to PaI. To address this issue, we propose Sign-In, which employs a dynamic reparameterization that provably induces sign flips. Such sign flips are complementary to the ones that dense-to-sparse training can accomplish, rendering Sign-In as an orthogonal method. While our experiments and theory suggest performance improvements of PaI, they also carve out the main open challenge to close the gap between PaI and dense-to-sparse training.
Advait Gadhikar, Tom Jacobs, Rebekka Burkholz
NeurIPS1
2025 Pay Attention to Small Weights
abstract
Finetuning large pretrained neural networks is known to be resource-intensive, both in terms of memory and computational cost. To mitigate this, a common approach is to restrict training to a subset of the model parameters. By analyzing the relationship between gradients and weights during finetuning, we observe a notable pattern: large gradients are often associated with small-magnitude weights. This correlation is more pronounced in fine-tuning settings than in training from scratch. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textsc{NanoAdam}, which dynamically updates only the small-magnitude weights during fine-tuning and offers several practical advantages: first, the criterion is \emph{gradient-free}—the parameter subset can be determined without gradient computation; second, it preserves large-magnitude weights, which are likely to encode critical features learned during pre-training, thereby reducing the risk of catastrophic forgetting; thirdly, it permits the use of larger learning rates and consistently leads to better generalization performance in experiments. We demonstrate this for both NLP and vision tasks.
Tom Jacobs, Advait Gadhikar, Rebekka Burkholz
NeurIPS3
2024 Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate Rewinding
abstract
Learning Rate Rewinding (LRR) has been established as a strong variant of Iterative Magnitude Pruning (IMP) to find lottery tickets in deep overparameterized neural networks. While both iterative pruning schemes couple structure and parameter learning, understanding how LRR excels in both aspects can bring us closer to the design of more flexible deep learning algorithms that can optimize diverse sets of sparse architectures. To this end, we conduct experiments that disentangle the effect of mask learning and parameter optimization and how both benefit from overparameterization. The ability of LRR to flip parameter signs early and stay robust to sign perturbations seems to make it not only more effective in mask identification but also in optimizing diverse sets of masks, including random ones. In support of this hypothesis, we prove in a simplified single hidden neuron setting that LRR succeeds in more cases than IMP, as it can escape initially problematic sign configurations.
Advait Gadhikar, Rebekka Burkholz
ICLR1
2023 Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse
abstract
Random masks define surprisingly effective sparse neural network models, as has been shown empirically. The resulting sparse networks can often compete with dense architectures and state-of-the-art lottery ticket pruning algorithms, even though they do not rely on computationally expensive prune-train iterations and can be drawn initially without significant computational overhead. We offer a theoretical explanation of how random masks can approximate arbitrary target networks if they are wider by a logarithmic factor in the inverse sparsity $1 / \log(1/\text{sparsity})$. This overparameterization factor is necessary at least for 3-layer random networks, which elucidates the observed degrading performance of random networks at higher sparsity. At moderate to high sparsity levels, however, our results imply that sparser networks are contained within random source networks so that any dense-to-sparse training scheme can be turned into a computationally more efficient sparse-to-sparse one by constraining the search to a fixed random mask. We demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in experiments for different pruning methods and propose particularly effective choices of initial layer-wise sparsity ratios of the random source network. As a special case, we show theoretically and experimentally that random source networks also contain strong lottery tickets.
Advait Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka Burkholz
ICML1
2021 Adaptive Quantization of Model Updates for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning
abstract
Communication of model updates between client nodes and the central aggregating server is a major bottleneck in federated learning, especially in bandwidth-limited settings and high-dimensional models. Gradient quantization is an effective way of reducing the number of bits required to communicate each model update, albeit at the cost of having a higher error floor due to the higher variance of the stochastic gradients. In this work, we propose an adaptive quantization strategy called AdaQuantFL that aims to achieve communication efficiency as well as a low error floor by changing the number of quantization levels during the course of training. Experiments on training deep neural networks show that our method can converge in much fewer communicated bits as compared to fixed quantization level setups, with little or no impact on training and test accuracy.
Divyansh Jhunjhunwala, Advait Gadhikar, Gauri Joshi, Yonina C. Eldar
ICASSP2
2021 Leveraging Spatial and Temporal Correlations in Sparsified Mean Estimation
abstract
We study the problem of estimating at a central server the mean of a set of vectors distributed across several nodes (one vector per node). When the vectors are high-dimensional, the communication cost of sending entire vectors may be prohibitive, and it may be imperative for them to use sparsification techniques. While most existing work on sparsified mean estimation is agnostic to the characteristics of the data vectors, in many practical applications such as federated learning, there may be spatial correlations (similarities in the vectors sent by different nodes) or temporal correlations (similarities in the data sent by a single node over different iterations of the algorithm) in the data vectors. We leverage these correlations by simply modifying the decoding method used by the server to estimate the mean. We provide an analysis of the resulting estimation error as well as experiments for PCA, K-Means and Logistic Regression, which show that our estimators consistently outperform more sophisticated and expensive sparsification methods.
Divyansh Jhunjhunwala, Ankur Mallick, Advait Gadhikar, Swanand Kadhe, Gauri Joshi
NeurIPS3