Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leon Riesebos
dblp:285/9773
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-7337-5589ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set Architecture · HPCA 2019 Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum software stack
quantum instruction set |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set Architecture · HPCA 2019 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum error correction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum error correction
surface code |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer Architectures · DAC 2017 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum control
quantum control microarchitecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set Architecture · HPCA 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
syndrome decoding · 0.3quantum error simulation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set ArchitectureabstractA widely-used quantum programming paradigm comprises of both the data How and control How. Existing quantum hardware cannot well support the control How, significantly limiting the range of quantum software executable on the hardware. By analyzing the constraints in the control microarchitecture, we found that existing quantum assembly languages are either too high-level or too restricted to support comprehensive How control on the hardware. Also, as observed with the quantum microinstruction set QuMIS [1], the quantum instruction set architecture (QISA) design may suffer from limited scalability and Hexibility because of microarchitectural constraints. It is an open challenge to design a scalable and Hexible QISA which provides a comprehensive abstraction of the quantum hardware. In this paper, we propose an executable QISA, called eQASM, that can be translated from quantum assembly language (QASM), supports comprehensive quantum program How control, and is executed on a quantum control microarchitecture. With efficient timing specification, single-operation-multiple-qubit execution, and a very-long-instruction-word architecture, eQASM presents better scalability than QuMIS. The definition of eQASM focuses on the assembly level to be expressive. Quantum operations are configured at compile time instead of being defined at QISA design time. We instantiate eQASM into a 32-bit instruction set targeting a seven-qubit superconducting quantum processor. We validate our design by performing several experiments on a two-qubit quantum processor. Xiang Fu 0003, Leon Riesebos, M. Adriaan Rol, Jeroen van Straten, Hans van Someren 0001, Nader Khammassi, Imran Ashraf 0002, R. F. L. Vermeulen, V. Newsum, K. K. L. Loh, J. C. de Sterke, W. J. Vlothuizen, R. N. Schouten, Carmen G. Almudéver, Leonardo DiCarlo, Koen Bertels |
HPCA | 2 |
| 2019 | Quantum Accelerated Computer ArchitecturesabstractModern computer applications usually consist of a variety of components that often require quite different computational co-processors. Some examples of such co-processors are TPUs, GPUs or FPGAs. A more recent and promising technology that is being investigated is quantum co-processors. In this paper, we present a modern computer architecture where a quantum co-processor is included as an additional accelerator. In such an environment, the idea is to execute the application on a heterogeneous architecture where the classic processor will execute the host part, but certain components will be mapped, in our case, on the quantum accelerator. To this purpose, we define the distinct layers for the quantum computer architecture where there is a clear boundary between the host program and quantum kernel(s). We also discuss the opportunities and challenges of mapping hybrid algorithms to such a heterogeneous quantum computer architecture. Leon Riesebos, Xiang Fu 0003, A. A. Moueddenne, Lingling Lao, Savvas Varsamopoulos, Imran Ashraf 0002, Hans van Someren 0001, Nader Khammassi, Carmen G. Almudéver, Koen Bertels |
ISCAS | 1 |
| 2017 | Pauli Frames for Quantum Computer ArchitecturesabstractThe Pauli frame mechanism allows Pauli gates to be tracked in classical electronics and can relax the timing constraints for error syndrome measurement and error decoding. When building a quantum computer, such a mechanism may be beneficial, and the goal of this paper is not only to study the working principles of a Pauli frame but also to quantify its potential effect on the logical error rate. To this purpose, we implemented and simulated the Pauli frame module which, in principle, can be directly mapped into a hardware implementation. Simulation of a surface code 17 logical qubit has shown that a Pauli frame can reduce the error rate of a logical qubit up to 70% compared to the same logical qubit without Pauli frame when the decoding time equals the error correction time, and maximum parallelism can be obtained. Leon Riesebos, Xiang Fu 0003, Savvas Varsamopoulos, Carmen G. Almudéver, Koen Bertels |
DAC | 1 |