Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hoiyi Ng
dblp:286/5449
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 48% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
reverse engineering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | RECoRD: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Reverse Engineering Codebase to Relational Diagram · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley Approach · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley Approach · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley Approach · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
shapley value explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley Approach · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
mediation analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley Approach · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement fine-tuning · 2.0multi-agent · 2.0large language model · 2.0shapley value · 0.5recursive shapley value · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | RECoRD: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Reverse Engineering Codebase to Relational DiagramabstractUnderstanding the behavior and logical structure of complex algorithms is a fundamental challenge in industrial systems. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable code understanding capabilities. However, their potential for reverse engineering algorithms into interpretable causal structures remains unexplored. In this work, we develop a multi-agent framework, RECoRD, that leverages LLMs to Reverse Engineering Codebase to Causal Relational Diagram. RECoRD uses reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) to enhance the reasoning accuracy of the relation extraction agent. Fine-tuning on expert-curated causal graphs allows smaller specialized models to outperform larger foundation models on domain-specific tasks. Experiments on three real-world use cases - News Vendor, MiniSCOT, and Black-Scholes - demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. The RFT-trained models significantly outperformed their foundation counterparts, improving F1 score from 0.69 to 0.97 on MiniSCOT. RECoRD also exhibited strong generalization, with models fine-tuned on one use case improving performance on others. We further show how the extracted causal graphs can be leveraged to build a deep-dive assistant that reasons like domain experts, enabling rapid root cause analysis in complex software systems. By automating the construction of interpretable causal models from code, RECoRD has wide-ranging applications in areas such as software debugging, operational optimization, and risk management. Hoiyi Ng |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2021 | Why did the distribution change?abstractWe describe a formal approach based on graphical causal models to identify the "root causes" of the change in the probability distribution of variables. After factorizing the joint distribution into conditional distributions of each variable, given its parents (the "causal mechanisms"), we attribute the change to changes of these causal mechanisms. This attribution analysis accounts for the fact that mechanisms often change independently and sometimes only some of them change. Through simulations, we study the performance of our distribution change attribution proposal. We then present a real-world case study identifying the drivers of the difference in the income distribution between men and women. Kailash Budhathoki, Dominik Janzing, Patrick Blöbaum, Hoiyi Ng |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2021 | Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley ApproachabstractWe study the attribution problem in a graphical model, wherein the objective is to quantify how the effect of changes at the source nodes propagates through the graph. We develop a model-agnostic flow-based attribution method, called recursive Shapley value (RSV). RSV generalizes a number of existing node-based methods and uniquely satisfies a set of flow-based axioms. In addition to admitting a natural characterization for linear models and facilitating mediation analysis for non-linear models, RSV satisfies a mix of desirable properties discussed in the recent literature, including implementation invariance, sensitivity, monotonicity, and affine scale invariance. Raghav Singal, George Michailidis, Hoiyi Ng |
ICML | 3 |