Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Serban Vadineanu

dblp:286/5500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Program analysis · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.412020
Robust and Accurate Period Inference using Regression-Based Techniques · RTSS 2020
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › schedulability analysis
response time analysis
0.412020
Robust and Accurate Period Inference using Regression-Based Techniques · RTSS 2020
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › trace analysis
execution trace analysis
0.112020
Robust and Accurate Period Inference using Regression-Based Techniques · RTSS 2020
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.112020
Robust and Accurate Period Inference using Regression-Based Techniques · RTSS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression-based machine learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Robust and accurate regression-based techniques for period inference in real-time systems
abstract
Abstract With the growth in complexity of real-time embedded systems, there is an increasing need for tools and techniques to understand and compare the observed runtime behavior of a system with the expected one. Since many real-time applications require periodic interactions with the environment, one of the fundamental problems in guaranteeing their temporal correctness is to be able to infer the periodicity of certain events in the system. The practicability of a period inference tool, however, depends on both its accuracy and robustness (also its resilience) against noise in the output trace of the system, e.g., when the system trace is impacted by the presence of aperiodic tasks, release jitters, and runtime variations in the execution time of the tasks. This work (i) presents the first period inference framework that uses regression-based machine-learning (RBML) methods, and (ii) thoroughly investigates the accuracy and robustness of different families of RBML methods in the presence of uncertainties in the system parameters. We show, on both synthetically generated traces and traces from actual systems, that our solutions can reduce the error of period estimation by two to three orders of magnitudes w.r.t. the state of the art.
Serban Vadineanu, Mitra Nasri
Real Time Syst.1
2020 Robust and Accurate Period Inference using Regression-Based Techniques
abstract
With the growth in complexity of real-time embedded systems, there is an increasing need for tools and techniques to understand and compare the observed runtime behavior of a system with the expected one. Since many real-time applications require periodic interactions with the environment, one of the fundamental problems in guaranteeing their temporal correctness is to be able to infer the periodicity of certain events in the system. The practicability of a period inference tool, however, depends on both its accuracy and robustness (also its resilience) against noise in the output trace of the system, e.g., when the system trace is impacted by the presence of aperiodic tasks, release jitters, and runtime variations in the execution time of the tasks. This work (i) presents the first period inference framework that uses regression-based machine-learning (RBML) methods, and (ii) thoroughly investigates the accuracy and robustness of different families of RBML methods in the presence of uncertainties in the system parameters. We show, on both synthetically generated traces and traces from actual systems, that our solutions can reduce the error of period estimation by two to three orders of magnitudes w.r.t. state of the art.
Serban Vadineanu, Mitra Nasri
RTSS1