Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guillaume Maillard

dblp:287/1420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation
0.512021
Aggregated Hold-Out · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.512021
Aggregated Hold-Out · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › excess risk bounds
oracle inequality
0.512021
Aggregated Hold-Out · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.512021
Aggregated Hold-Out · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel regression · 0.5convex risk minimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Aggregated Hold-Out
abstract
Aggregated hold-out (agghoo) is a method which averages learning rules selected by hold-out (that is, cross-validation with a single split). We provide the first theoretical guarantees on agghoo, ensuring that it can be used safely: Agghoo performs at worst like the hold-out when the risk is convex. The same holds true in classification with the 0--1 risk, with an additional constant factor. For the hold-out, oracle inequalities are known for bounded losses, as in binary classification. We show that similar results can be proved, under appropriate assumptions, for other risk-minimization problems. In particular, we obtain an oracle inequality for regularized kernel regression with a Lipschitz loss, without requiring that the $Y$ variable or the regressors be bounded. Numerical experiments show that aggregation brings a significant improvement over the hold-out and that agghoo is competitive with cross-validation.
Guillaume Maillard, Sylvain Arlot, Matthieu Lerasle
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1