VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sana Ayromlou
dblp:288/0891
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 57% Representation and self-supervised learning · 24% Generative modeling · 19% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
conditional image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Generative Models Improve Self-Supervised Representation Learning? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
personalized federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
joint-embedding self-supervised learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Can Generative Models Improve Self-Supervised Representation Learning? · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.9maximum mean discrepancy · 0.9joint-embedding SSL · 0.9generative model · 0.9ditto · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Can Generative Models Improve Self-Supervised Representation Learning?abstractThe rapid advancement in self-supervised representation learning has highlighted its potential to leverage unlabeled data for learning rich visual representations. However, the existing techniques, particularly those employing different augmentations of the same image, often rely on a limited set of simple transformations that cannot fully capture variations in the real world. This constrains the diversity and quality of samples, which leads to sub-optimal representations. In this paper, we introduce a framework that enriches the self-supervised learning (SSL) paradigm by utilizing generative models to produce semantically consistent image augmentations. By directly conditioning generative models on a source image, our method enables the generation of diverse augmentations while maintaining the semantics of the source image, thus offering a richer set of data for SSL. Our extensive experimental results on various joint-embedding SSL techniques demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the quality of learned visual representations by up to 10% Top-1 accuracy in downstream tasks. This research demonstrates that incorporating generative models into the joint-embedding SSL workflow opens new avenues for exploring the potential of synthetic data. This development paves the way for more robust and versatile representation learning techniques. Sana Ayromlou, Vahid Reza Khazaie, Fereshteh Forghani, Arash Afkanpour |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Adaptive Latent-Space Constraints in Personalized Federated LearningabstractFederated learning (FL) is an effective and widely used approach to training deep learning models on decentralized datasets held by distinct clients. FL also strengthens both security and privacy protections for training data. Common challenges associated with statistical heterogeneity between distributed datasets have spurred significant interest in personalized FL (pFL) methods, where models combine aspects of global learning with local modeling specific to each client’s unique characteristics. This work investigates the efficacy of theoretically supported, adaptive MMD measures in pFL, primarily focusing on the Ditto framework, a state-of-the-art technique for distributed data heterogeneity. The use of such measures significantly improves model performance across a variety of tasks, especially those with pronounced feature heterogeneity. Additional experiments demonstrate that such measures are directly applicable to other pFL techniques and yield similar improvements across a number of datasets. Finally, the results motivate the use of constraints tailored to the various kinds of heterogeneity expected in FL systems. Sana Ayromlou, David B. Emerson |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | CCSI: Continual Class-Specific Impression for data-free class incremental learning
Sana Ayromlou, Teresa Tsang, Purang Abolmaesumi, Xiaoxiao Li 0001 |
Medical Image Anal. | 1 |
| 2022 | Class Impression for Data-Free Incremental Learning
Sana Ayromlou, Purang Abolmaesumi, Teresa Tsang, Xiaoxiao Li 0001 |
MICCAI (4) | 1 |