VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elizabeth A. Ainsworth
dblp:288/3525
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3199-8999ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 36% Graph learning · 29% Efficient and distributed learning · 29% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
cross-network node classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-IID Transfer Learning on Graphs · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Personalized Federated Learning with Parameter Propagation · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-IID Transfer Learning on Graphs · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
graph transfer learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-IID Transfer Learning on Graphs · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
personalized federated learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Personalized Federated Learning with Parameter Propagation · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
domain adaptation regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distribution-Informed Neural Networks for Domain Adaptation Regression · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Non-IID Transfer Learning on Graphs · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Distribution-Informed Neural Networks for Domain Adaptation Regression · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Distribution-Informed Neural Networks for Domain Adaptation Regression · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weisfeiler-lehman graph isomorphism test · 0.7parameter propagation · 0.7graph subtree discrepancy · 0.7generalization bounds · 0.7reweighting · 0.6maximum mean discrepancy · 0.6distribution-informed neural network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Non-IID Transfer Learning on GraphsabstractTransfer learning refers to the transfer of knowledge or information from a relevant source domain to a target domain. However, most existing transfer learning theories and algorithms focus on IID tasks, where the source/target samples are assumed to be independent and identically distributed. Very little effort is devoted to theoretically studying the knowledge transferability on non-IID tasks, e.g., cross-network mining. To bridge the gap, in this paper, we propose rigorous generalization bounds and algorithms for cross-network transfer learning from a source graph to a target graph. The crucial idea is to characterize the cross-network knowledge transferability from the perspective of the Weisfeiler-Lehman graph isomorphism test. To this end, we propose a novel Graph Subtree Discrepancy to measure the graph distribution shift between source and target graphs. Then the generalization error bounds on cross-network transfer learning, including both cross-network node classification and link prediction tasks, can be derived in terms of the source knowledge and the Graph Subtree Discrepancy across domains. This thereby motivates us to propose a generic graph adaptive network (GRADE) to minimize the distribution shift between source and target graphs for cross-network transfer learning. Experimental results verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our GRADE framework on both cross-network node classification and cross-domain recommendation tasks. Jun Wu 0019, Jingrui He, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2023 | Personalized Federated Learning with Parameter PropagationabstractWith decentralized data collected from diverse clients, a personalized federated learning paradigm has been proposed for training machine learning models without exchanging raw data from local clients. We dive into personalized federated learning from the perspective of privacy-preserving transfer learning, and identify the limitations of previous personalized federated learning algorithms. First, previous works suffer from negative knowledge transferability for some clients, when focusing more on the overall performance of all clients. Second, high communication costs are required to explicitly learn statistical task relatedness among clients. Third, it is computationally expensive to generalize the learned knowledge from experienced clients to new clients. Jun Wu 0019, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Jingrui He |
KDD | 3 |
| 2022 | Adaptive Knowledge Transfer on Evolving DomainsabstractIn this paper, we study the dynamic transfer learning problem involving adaptive knowledge transfer from a static source domain to a time evolving target domain. One major challenge is the time evolving relatedness of the source domain and the current target domain as the target domain evolves over time. To address this challenge, we derive a generic error bound on the current target domain with flexible domain discrepancy measures. Moreover, we propose a label-informed $\mathcal{C}$-divergence to measure the shift of joint data distributions (over input features and output labels) across domains. The resulting tighter error bound with $\mathcal{C}$-divergence motivates us to develop a novel dynamic transfer learning algorithm TransLATE. Empirical results on various data sets confirm the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm in modeling the time evolving target domain. Jun Wu 0019, Hanghang Tong, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Jingrui He |
IEEE Big Data | 3 |
| 2022 | Distribution-Informed Neural Networks for Domain Adaptation RegressionabstractIn this paper, we study the problem of domain adaptation regression, which learns a regressor for a target domain by leveraging the knowledge from a relevant source domain. We start by proposing a distribution-informed neural network, which aims to build distribution-aware relationship of inputs and outputs from different domains. This allows us to develop a simple domain adaptation regression framework, which subsumes popular domain adaptation approaches based on domain invariant representation learning, reweighting, and adaptive Gaussian process. The resulting findings not only explain the connections of existing domain adaptation approaches, but also motivate the efficient training of domain adaptation approaches with overparameterized neural networks. We also analyze the convergence and generalization error bound of our framework based on the distribution-informed neural network. Specifically, our generalization bound focuses explicitly on the maximum mean discrepancy in the RKHS induced by the neural tangent kernel of distribution-informed neural network. This is in sharp contrast to the existing work which relies on domain discrepancy in the latent feature space heuristically formed by one or several hidden neural layers. The efficacy of our framework is also empirically verified on a variety of domain adaptation regression benchmarks. Jun Wu 0019, Jingrui He, Sheng Wang 0020, Kaiyu Guan, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth |
NeurIPS | 5 |