VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rajat Vadiraj Dwaraknath
dblp:289/1785
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Learning theory · 21% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SD-KDE: Score-Debiased Kernel Density Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
kernel density estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SD-KDE: Score-Debiased Kernel Density Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score-based model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SD-KDE: Score-Debiased Kernel Density Estimation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex Programs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex Programs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex Programs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex Programs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex Programs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
effective resistance estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Optimal Effective Resistance Estimation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Optimal Effective Resistance Estimation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
sketching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Optimal Effective Resistance Estimation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Optimal Effective Resistance Estimation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score function estimation · 0.9bandwidth selection · 0.9sketching · 0.7iterative reweighting · 0.7group lasso · 0.7gated ReLU networks · 0.7eigenvalue estimation · 0.7convex optimization · 0.7conditional hardness · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SD-KDE: Score-Debiased Kernel Density EstimationabstractWe propose a method for density estimation that leverages an estimated score function to debias kernel density estimation (SD-KDE).
In our approach, each data point is adjusted by taking a single step along the score function with a specific choice of step size, followed by standard KDE with a modified bandwidth.
The step size and modified bandwidth are chosen to remove the leading order bias in the KDE, improving the asymptotic convergence rate.
Our experiments on synthetic tasks in 1D, 2D and on MNIST, demonstrate that our proposed SD-KDE method significantly reduces the mean integrated squared error compared to the standard Silverman KDE, even with noisy estimates in the score function.
These results underscore the potential of integrating score-based corrections into nonparametric density estimation. Elliot L. Epstein, Rajat Vadiraj Dwaraknath, Thanawat Sornwanee, John Winnicki, Jerry W. Liu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Fixing the NTK: From Neural Network Linearizations to Exact Convex ProgramsabstractRecently, theoretical analyses of deep neural networks have broadly focused on two directions: 1) Providing insight into neural network training by SGD in the limit of infinite hidden-layer width and infinitesimally small learning rate (also known as gradient flow) via the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), and 2) Globally optimizing the regularized training objective via cone-constrained convex reformulations of ReLU networks. The latter research direction also yielded an alternative formulation of the ReLU network, called a gated ReLU network, that is globally optimizable via efficient unconstrained convex programs. In this work, we interpret the convex program for this gated ReLU network as a Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) model with a weighted data masking feature map and establish a connection to the NTK. Specifically, we show that for a particular choice of mask weights that do not depend on the learning targets, this kernel is equivalent to the NTK of the gated ReLU network on the training data. A consequence of this lack of dependence on the targets is that the NTK cannot perform better than the optimal MKL kernel on the training set. By using iterative reweighting, we improve the weights induced by the NTK to obtain the optimal MKL kernel which is equivalent to the solution of the exact convex reformulation of the gated ReLU network. We also provide several numerical simulations corroborating our theory. Additionally, we provide an analysis of the prediction error of the resulting optimal kernel via consistency results for the group lasso. Rajat Vadiraj Dwaraknath, Tolga Ergen, Mert Pilanci |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards Optimal Effective Resistance EstimationabstractWe provide new algorithms and conditional hardness for the problem of estimating effective resistances in $n$-node $m$-edge undirected, expander graphs. We provide an $\widetilde{O}(m\epsilon^{-1})$-time algorithm that produces with high probability, an $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$-bit sketch from which the effective resistance between any pair of nodes can be estimated, to $(1 \pm \epsilon)$-multiplicative accuracy, in $\widetilde{O}(1)$-time. Consequently, we obtain an $\widetilde{O}(m\epsilon^{-1})$-time algorithm for estimating the effective resistance of all edges in such graphs, improving (for sparse graphs) on the previous fastest runtimes of $\widetilde{O}(m\epsilon^{-3/2})$ [Chu et. al. 2018] and $\widetilde{O}(n^2\epsilon^{-1})$ [Jambulapati, Sidford, 2018] for general graphs and $\widetilde{O}(m + n\epsilon^{-2})$ for expanders [Li, Sachdeva 2022].
We complement this result by showing a conditional lower bound that a broad set of algorithms for computing such estimates of the effective resistances between all pairs of nodes require $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^2 \epsilon^{-1/2})$-time, improving upon the previous best such lower bound of $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^2 \epsilon^{-1/13})$ [Musco et. al. 2017]. Further, we leverage the tools underlying these results to obtain improved algorithms and conditional hardness for more general problems of sketching the pseudoinverse of positive semidefinite matrices and estimating functions of their eigenvalues. Rajat Vadiraj Dwaraknath, Ishani Karmarkar, Aaron Sidford |
NeurIPS | 1 |