Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pini Zilber
dblp:289/5352
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 58% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
mixed linear regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
robust regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › matrix completion
inductive matrix completion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
optimization landscape |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gauss-newton method · 1.1robust regression · 0.7iteratively reweighted least squares · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Imbalanced Mixed Linear RegressionabstractWe consider the problem of mixed linear regression (MLR), where each observed sample belongs to one of $K$ unknown linear models.
In practical applications, the mixture of the $K$ models may be imbalanced with a significantly different number of samples from each model. Unfortunately, most MLR methods do not perform well in such settings. Motivated by this practical challenge, in this work we propose Mix-IRLS, a novel, simple and fast algorithm for MLR with excellent performance on both balanced and imbalanced mixtures.
In contrast to popular approaches that recover the $K$ models simultaneously, Mix-IRLS does it sequentially using tools from robust regression. Empirically, beyond imbalanced mixtures, Mix-IRLS succeeds in a broad range of additional settings where other methods fail, including small sample sizes, presence of outliers, and an unknown number of models $K$. Furthermore, Mix-IRLS outperforms competing methods on several real-world datasets, in some cases by a large margin. We complement our empirical results by deriving a recovery guarantee for Mix-IRLS, which highlights its advantage on imbalanced mixtures. Pini Zilber, Boaz Nadler |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast AlgorithmabstractThe inductive matrix completion (IMC) problem is to recover a low rank matrix from few observed entries while incorporating prior knowledge about its row and column subspaces. In this work, we make three contributions to the IMC problem: (i) we prove that under suitable conditions, the IMC optimization landscape has no bad local minima; (ii) we derive a simple scheme with theoretical guarantees to estimate the rank of the unknown matrix; and (iii) we propose GNIMC, a simple Gauss-Newton based method to solve the IMC problem, analyze its runtime and derive for it strong recovery guarantees. The guarantees for GNIMC are sharper in several aspects than those available for other methods, including a quadratic convergence rate, fewer required observed entries and stability to errors or deviations from low-rank. Empirically, given entries observed uniformly at random, GNIMC recovers the underlying matrix substantially faster than several competing methods. Pini Zilber, Boaz Nadler |
ICML | 1 |