Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pini Zilber

dblp:289/5352 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 58% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
mixed linear regression
0.712023
Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.712023
Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
robust regression
0.712023
Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › matrix completion
inductive matrix completion
0.612022
Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion
0.612022
Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.612022
Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
optimization landscape
0.612022
Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gauss-newton method · 1.1robust regression · 0.7iteratively reweighted least squares · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Imbalanced Mixed Linear Regression
abstract
We consider the problem of mixed linear regression (MLR), where each observed sample belongs to one of $K$ unknown linear models. In practical applications, the mixture of the $K$ models may be imbalanced with a significantly different number of samples from each model. Unfortunately, most MLR methods do not perform well in such settings. Motivated by this practical challenge, in this work we propose Mix-IRLS, a novel, simple and fast algorithm for MLR with excellent performance on both balanced and imbalanced mixtures. In contrast to popular approaches that recover the $K$ models simultaneously, Mix-IRLS does it sequentially using tools from robust regression. Empirically, beyond imbalanced mixtures, Mix-IRLS succeeds in a broad range of additional settings where other methods fail, including small sample sizes, presence of outliers, and an unknown number of models $K$. Furthermore, Mix-IRLS outperforms competing methods on several real-world datasets, in some cases by a large margin. We complement our empirical results by deriving a recovery guarantee for Mix-IRLS, which highlights its advantage on imbalanced mixtures.
Pini Zilber, Boaz Nadler
NeurIPS1
2022 Inductive Matrix Completion: No Bad Local Minima and a Fast Algorithm
abstract
The inductive matrix completion (IMC) problem is to recover a low rank matrix from few observed entries while incorporating prior knowledge about its row and column subspaces. In this work, we make three contributions to the IMC problem: (i) we prove that under suitable conditions, the IMC optimization landscape has no bad local minima; (ii) we derive a simple scheme with theoretical guarantees to estimate the rank of the unknown matrix; and (iii) we propose GNIMC, a simple Gauss-Newton based method to solve the IMC problem, analyze its runtime and derive for it strong recovery guarantees. The guarantees for GNIMC are sharper in several aspects than those available for other methods, including a quadratic convergence rate, fewer required observed entries and stability to errors or deviations from low-rank. Empirically, given entries observed uniformly at random, GNIMC recovers the underlying matrix substantially faster than several competing methods.
Pini Zilber, Boaz Nadler
ICML1