The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping creative work and education. While research has demonstrated AI's potential to enhance creative outcomes, the processes underlying human-AI co-creation remain insufficiently explored. This study investigates the dynamics of human-AI co-creation in an undergraduate game design course by leveraging Learning Analytics and Epistemic Network Analysis. Specifically, it examines how students’ creative thinking types (divergent, convergent, and evaluative thinking) interact with their contribution types (creating new ideas, extending ideas, refining ideas, and transforming ideas) during co-creation with AI. Results reveal the collaborative role of different thinking types in the student-AI co-creative process. Divergent thinking primarily drives the generation of new ideas, while convergent and evaluative thinking are essential for refinement and quality control. These cognitive-behavioral relationships evolve across learning phases, shifting from open exploration to focused integration. Furthermore, high-achieving students strategically employ convergent thinking and engage in continuous refinement and transformation with AI, whereas lower-achieving students tend to remain at the exploratory stage and rely on initial AI outputs. Practically, the findings underscore the importance of supporting students in shifting between creative thinking modes, promoting critical evaluation, and offering phase-specific guidance to facilitate effective and meaningful co-creation with AI in educational settings.

Learning analytics dashboards (LADs) simplify complex learner data into accessible visualisations, providing actionable insights for educators and students. However, their educational effectiveness has not always matched the sophistication of the technology behind them. Explanatory and interactive LADs, enhanced by generative AI (GenAI) chatbots, hold promise by enabling dynamic, dialogue-based interactions with data visualisations and offering personalised feedback through text. Yet, the effectiveness of these tools may be limited by learners' varying levels of GenAI literacy, a factor that remains underexplored in current research. This study investigates the role of GenAI literacy in learner interactions with conventional (reactive) versus scaffolding (proactive) chatbot-assisted LADs. Through a comparative analysis of 81 participants, we examine how GenAI literacy is associated with learners' ability to interpret complex visualisations and their cognitive processes during interactions with chatbot-assisted LADs. Results show that while both chatbots significantly improved learner comprehension, those with higher GenAI literacy benefited the most, particularly with conventional chatbots, demonstrating diverse prompting strategies. Findings highlight the importance of considering learners' GenAI literacy when integrating GenAI chatbots in LADs and educational technologies. Incorporating scaffolding techniques within GenAI chatbots can be an effective strategy, offering a more guided experience that reduces reliance on learners' GenAI literacy.

Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) leverages advanced sensing technologies and artificial intelligence to capture complex learning processes, but integrating diverse data sources into cohesive insights remains challenging. This study introduces a novel methodology for integrating latent class analysis (LCA) within MMLA to map monomodal behavioural indicators into parsimonious multimodal ones. Using a high-fidelity healthcare simulation context, we collected positional, audio, and physiological data, deriving 17 monomodal indicators. LCA identified four distinct latent classes: Collaborative Communication, Embodied Collaboration, Distant Interaction, and Solitary Engagement, each capturing unique monomodal patterns. Epistemic network analysis compared these multimodal indicators with the original monomodal indicators and found that the multimodal approach was more parsimonious while offering higher explanatory power regarding students' task and collaboration performances. The findings highlight the potential of LCA in simplifying the analysis of complex multimodal data while capturing nuanced, cross-modality behaviours, offering actionable insights for educators and enhancing the design of collaborative learning interventions. This study proposes a pathway for advancing MMLA, making it more parsimonious and manageable, and aligning with the principles of learner-centred education.

Students are increasingly relying on Generative AI (GAI) to support their writing - a key pedagogical practice in education. In GAI-assisted writing, students can delegate core cognitive tasks (e.g., generating ideas and turning them into sentences) to GAI while still producing high-quality essays. This creates new challenges for teachers in assessing and supporting student learning, as they often lack insight into whether students are engaging in meaningful cognitive processes during writing or how much of the essay's quality can be attributed to those processes. This study aimed to help teachers better assess and support student learning in GAI-assisted writing by examining how different writing behaviors, especially those indicative of meaningful learning versus those that are not, impact essay quality. Using a dataset of 1,445 GAI-assisted writing sessions, we applied the cutting-edge method, X-Learner, to quantify the causal impact of three GAI-assisted writing behavioral patterns (i.e., seeking suggestions but not accepting them, seeking suggestions and accepting them as they are, and seeking suggestions and accepting them with modification) on four measures of essay quality (i.e., lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity, text cohesion, and linguistic bias). Our analysis showed that writers who frequently modified GAI-generated text - suggesting active engagement in higher-order cognitive processes - consistently improved the quality of their essays in terms of lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity, and text cohesion. In contrast, those who often accepted GAI-generated text without changes, primarily engaging in lower-order processes, saw a decrease in essay quality. Additionally, while human writers tend to introduce linguistic bias when writing independently, incorporating GAI-generated text - even without modification - can help mitigate this bias.

Data storytelling (DS) is rapidly gaining attention as an approach that integrates data, visuals, and narratives to create data stories that can help a particular audience to comprehend the key messages underscored by the data with enhanced efficiency and effectiveness. It is been posited that DS can be especially advantageous for audiences with limited visualisation literacy, by presenting the data clearly and concisely. However, empirical studies confirming whether data stories indeed provide these benefits over conventional data visualisations are scarce. To bridge this gap, we conducted a study with 103 participants to determine whether DS indeed improve both efficiency and effectiveness in tasks related to information retrieval and insights comprehension. Our findings suggest that data stories do improve the efficiency of comprehension tasks, as well as the effectiveness of comprehension tasks that involve a single insight, compared with conventional visualisations. Interestingly, these benefits were not associated with participants’ visualisation literacy.

Advancements in Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) have the potential to enhance the development of effective teamwork skills and foster reflection on collaboration dynamics in physical learning environments. Yet, only a few MMLA studies have closed the learning analytics loop by making MMLA solutions immediately accessible to educators to support reflective practices, especially in authentic settings. Moreover, deploying MMLA solutions in authentic settings can bring new challenges beyond logistic and privacy issues. This paper reports the design and use of TeamSlides, a multimodal teamwork analytics dashboard to support teacher-guided reflection. We conducted an in-the-wild classroom study involving 11 teachers and 138 students. Multimodal data were collected from students working in team healthcare simulations. We examined how teachers used the dashboard in 22 debrief sessions to aid their reflective practices. We also interviewed teachers to discuss their perceptions of the dashboard’s value and the challenges faced during its use. Our results suggest that the dashboard effectively reinforced discussions and augmented teacher-guided reflection practices. However, teachers encountered interpretation conflicts, sometimes leading to mistrust or misrepresenting the information. We discuss the considerations needed to overcome these challenges in MMLA research.

Individual behavioral engagement is an important indicator of active learning in collaborative settings, encompassing multidimensional behaviors mediated through various interaction modes. Little existing work has explored the use of multimodal process data to understand individual behavioral engagement in face-to-face collaborative learning settings. In this study we bridge this gap, for the first time, introducing a heterogeneous tripartite network approach to analyze the interconnections among multimodal process data in collaborative learning. Students’ behavioral engagement strategies are analyzed based on their interaction patterns with various spatial locations and verbal communication types using a heterogeneous tripartite network. The multimodal collaborative learning process data were collected from 15 teams of four students. We conducted stochastic blockmodeling on a projection of the heterogeneous tripartite network to cluster students into groups that shared similar spatial and oral engagement patterns. We found two distinct clusters of students, whose characteristic behavioural engagement strategies were identified by extracting interaction patterns that were statistically significant relative to a multinomial null model. The two identified clusters also exhibited a statistically significant difference regarding students’ perceived collaboration satisfaction and teacher-assessed team performance level. This study advances collaboration analytics methodology and provides new insights into personalized support in collaborative learning.

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), exemplified by ChatGPT, Midjourney, and other state-of-the-art large language models and diffusion models, holds significant potential for transforming education and enhancing human productivity. While the prevalence of GenAI in education has motivated numerous research initiatives, integrating these technologies within the learning analytics (LA) cycle and their implications for practical interventions remain underexplored. This paper delves into the prospective opportunities and challenges GenAI poses for advancing LA. We present a concise overview of the current GenAI landscape and contextualise its potential roles within Clow’s generic framework of the LA cycle. We posit that GenAI can play pivotal roles in analysing unstructured data, generating synthetic learner data, enriching multimodal learner interactions, advancing interactive and explanatory analytics, and facilitating personalisation and adaptive interventions. As the lines blur between learners and GenAI tools, a renewed understanding of learners is needed. Future research can delve deep into frameworks and methodologies that advocate for human-AI collaboration. The LA community can play a pivotal role in capturing data about human and AI contributions and exploring how they can collaborate most effectively. As LA advances, it is essential to consider the pedagogical implications and broader socioeconomic impact of GenAI for ensuring an inclusive future.

Effective collaboration and team communication are critical across many sectors. However, the complex dynamics of collaboration in physical learning spaces, with overlapping dialogue segments and varying participant interactions, pose assessment challenges for educators and self-reflection difficulties for students. Epistemic network analysis (ENA) is a relatively novel technique that has been used in learning analytics (LA) to unpack salient aspects of group communication. Yet, most LA works based on ENA have primarily sought to advance research knowledge rather than directly aid teachers and students by closing the LA loop. We address this gap by conducting a study in which we i) engaged teachers in designing human-centred versions of epistemic networks; ii) formulated an NLP methodology to code physically distributed dialogue segments of students based on multimodal (audio and positioning) data, enabling automatic generation of epistemic networks; and iii) deployed the automatically generated epistemic networks in 28 authentic learning sessions and investigated how they can support teaching. The results indicate the viability of completing the analytics loop through the design of streamlined epistemic network representations that enable teachers to support students’ reflections.

Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) innovations make use of rapidly evolving sensing and artificial intelligence algorithms to collect rich data about learning activities that unfold in physical spaces. The analysis of these data is opening exciting new avenues for both studying and supporting learning. Yet, practical and logistical challenges commonly appear while deploying MMLA innovations “in-the-wild”. These can span from technical issues related to enhancing the learning space with sensing capabilities, to the increased complexity of teachers’ tasks. These practicalities have been rarely investigated. This article addresses this gap by presenting a set of lessons learnt from a 2-year human-centred MMLA in-the-wild study conducted with 399 students and 17 educators in the context of nursing education. The lessons learnt were synthesised into topics related to (i) technological/physical aspects of the deployment; (ii) multimodal data and interfaces; (iii) the design process; (iv) participation, ethics and privacy; and (v) sustainability of the deployment.

Capturing data on socio-spatial behaviours is essential in obtaining meaningful educational insights into collaborative learning and teamwork in co-located learning contexts. Existing solutions, however, have limitations regarding scalability and practicality since they rely largely on costly location tracking systems, are labour-intensive, or are unsuitable for complex learning environments. To address these limitations, we propose an innovative computer-vision-based approach – Computer Vision for Position Estimation (CVPE) – for collecting socio-spatial data in complex learning settings where sophisticated collaborations occur. CVPE is scalable and practical with a fast processing time and only needs low-cost hardware (e.g., cameras and computers). The built-in privacy protection modules also minimise potential privacy and data security issues by masking individuals’ facial identities and provide options to automatically delete recordings after processing, making CVPE a suitable option for generating continuous multimodal/classroom analytics. The potential of CVPE was evaluated by applying it to analyse video data about teamwork in simulation-based learning. The results showed that CVPE extracted socio-spatial behaviours relatively reliably from video recordings compared to indoor positioning data. These socio-spatial behaviours extracted with CVPE uncovered valuable insights into teamwork when analysed with epistemic network analysis. The limitations of CVPE for effective use in learning analytics are also discussed.

Homophily is a fundamental sociological theory that describes the tendency of individuals to interact with others who share similar attributes. This theory has shown evident relevance for studying collaborative learning and classroom orchestration in learning analytics research from a social constructivist perspective. Emerging advancements in multimodal learning analytics have shown promising results in capturing interaction data and generating socio-spatial analytics in physical learning spaces through computer vision and wearable positioning technologies. Yet, there are limited ways for analysing homophily (e.g., social network analysis; SNA), especially for unpacking the temporal connections between different homophilic behaviours. This paper presents a novel analytic approach, Social-epistemic Network Analysis (SeNA), for analysing homophily by combining social network analysis with epistemic network analysis to infuse socio-spatial analytics with temporal insights. The additional insights SeNA may offer over traditional approaches (e.g., SNA) were illustrated through analysing the homophily of 98 students in open learning spaces. The findings showed that SeNA could reveal significant behavioural differences in homophily between comparison groups across different learning designs, which were not accessible to SNA alone. The implications and limitations of SeNA in supporting future learning analytics research regarding homophily in physical learning spaces are also discussed.

Embodied team learning is a form of group learning that occurs in co-located settings where students need to interact with others while actively using resources in the physical learning space to achieve a common goal. In such situations, communication dynamics can be complex as team discourse segments can happen in parallel at different locations of the physical space with varied team member configurations. This can make it hard for teachers to assess the effectiveness of teamwork and for students to reflect on their own experiences. To address this problem, we propose METS (Multimodal Embodied Teamwork Signature), a method to model team dialogue content in combination with spatial and temporal data to generate a signature of embodied teamwork. We present a study in the context of a highly dynamic healthcare team simulation space where students can freely move. We illustrate how signatures of embodied teamwork can help to identify key differences between high and low performing teams: i) across the whole learning session; ii) at different phases of learning sessions; and iii) at particular spaces of interest in the learning space.

Teacher’s in-class positioning and interaction patterns (termed spatial pedagogy) are an essential part of their classroom management and orchestration strategies that can substantially impact students’ learning. Yet, effective management of teachers’ spatial pedagogy can become increasingly challenging as novel architectural designs, such as open learning spaces, aim to disrupt teaching conventions by promoting flexible pedagogical approaches and maximising student connectedness. Multimodal learning analytics and indoor positioning technologies may hold promises to support teachers in complex learning spaces by making salient aspects of their spatial pedagogy visible for provoking reflection. This paper explores how granular x-y positioning data can be modelled into socio-spatial metrics that can contain insights about teachers’ spatial pedagogy across various learning designs. A total of approximately 172.63 million position data points were collected during 101 classes over eight weeks. The results illustrate how indoor positioning analytics can help generate a deeper understanding of how teachers use their learning spaces, such as their 1) teaching responsibilities; 2) proactive or passive interactions with students; and 3) supervisory, interactional, collaborative, and authoritative teaching approaches. Implications of the current findings to future learning analytics research and educational practices were also discussed.

Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) innovations are commonly aimed at supporting learners in physical learning spaces through state-of-the-art sensing technologies and analysis techniques. Although a growing body of MMLA research has demonstrated the potential benefits of sensor-based technologies in education, whether their use can be scalable, sustainable, and ethical remains questionable. Such uncertainty can limit future research and the potential adoption of MMLA by educational stakeholders in authentic learning situations. To address this, we systematically reviewed the methodological, operational, and ethical challenges faced by current MMLA works that can affect the scalability and sustainability of future MMLA innovations. A total of 96 peer-reviewed articles published after 2010 were included. The findings were summarised into three recommendations, including i) improving reporting standards by including sufficient details about sensors, analysis techniques, and the full disclosure of evaluation metrics, ii) fostering interdisciplinary collaborations among experts in learning analytics, software, and hardware engineering to develop affordable sensors and upgrade MMLA innovations that used discontinued technologies, and iii) developing ethical guidelines to address the potential risks of bias, privacy, and equality concerns with using MMLA innovations. Through these future research directions, MMLA can remain relevant and eventually have actual impacts on educational practices.

In co-located situations, team members use a combination of verbal and visual signals to communicate effectively, among which positional forms play a key role. The spatial patterns adopted by team members in terms of where in the physical space they are standing, and who their body is oriented to, can be key in analysing and increasing the quality of interaction during such face-to-face situations. In this paper, we model the students’ communication based on spatial (positioning) and audio (voice detection) data captured from 92 students working in teams of four in the context of healthcare simulation. We extract non-verbal events (i.e., total speaking time, overlapped speech,and speech responses to team members and teachers) and investigate to what extent they can serve as meaningful indicators of students’ performance according to teachers’ learning intentions. The contribution of this paper to multimodal learning analytics includes: i) a generic method to semi-automatically model communication in a setting where students can freely move in the learning space; and ii) results from a mixed-methods analysis of non-verbal indicators of team communication with respect to teachers’ learning design.

Schools are increasingly becoming into complex learning spaces where students interact with various physical and digital resources, educators, and peers. Although the field of learning analytics has advanced in analysing logs captured from digital tools, less progress has been made in understanding the social dynamics that unfold in physical learning spaces. Among the various rapidly emerging sensing technologies, position tracking may hold promises to reveal salient aspects of activities in physical learning spaces such as the formation of interpersonal ties among students. This paper explores how granular x-y physical positioning data can be analysed to model social interactions among students and teachers. We conducted an 8-week longitudinal study in which positioning traces of 98 students and six teachers were automatically captured every day in an open-plan public primary school. Positioning traces were analysed using social network analytics (SNA) to extract a set of metrics to characterise students’ positioning behaviours and social ties at cohort and individual levels. Results illustrate how analysing positioning traces through the lens of SNA can enable the identification of certain pedagogical approaches that may be either promoting or discouraging in-class social interaction, and students who may be socially isolated.