Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liang Bin
dblp:289/6663
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent generative model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
offline policy optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
latent variable generative model · 0.6advantage weighting · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | LAPO: Latent-Variable Advantage-Weighted Policy Optimization for Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractOffline reinforcement learning methods hold the promise of learning policies from pre-collected datasets without the need to query the environment for new samples. This setting is particularly well-suited for continuous control robotic applications for which online data collection based on trial-and-error is costly and potentially unsafe. In practice, offline datasets are often heterogeneous, i.e., collected in a variety of scenarios, such as data from several human demonstrators or from policies that act with different purposes. Unfortunately, such datasets often contain action distributions with multiple modes and, in some cases, lack a sufficient number of high-reward trajectories, which render offline policy training inefficient. To address this challenge, we propose to leverage latent-variable generative model to represent high-advantage state-action pairs leading to better adherence to data distributions that contributes to solving the task, while maximizing reward via a policy over the latent variable. As we empirically show on a range of simulated locomotion, navigation, and manipulation tasks, our method referred to as latent-variable advantage-weighted policy optimization (LAPO), improves the average performance of the next best-performing offline reinforcement learning methods by 49\% on heterogeneous datasets, and by 8\% on datasets with narrow and biased distributions. Ali Ghadirzadeh, Tianhe Yu, Alex Yuan Gao, Liang Bin, Chelsea Finn, Chongjie Zhang |
NeurIPS | 7 |