Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ammar Fayad
dblp:289/7500
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory
dependence measure |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Slicing Optimality for Mutual Information · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › information measures › mutual information
mutual information estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Slicing Optimality for Mutual Information · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › information measures › mutual information
sliced mutual information |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Slicing Optimality for Mutual Information · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning frameworks · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | On Slicing Optimality for Mutual InformationabstractMeasuring dependence between two random variables is of great importance in various domains but is difficult to compute in today's complex environments with high-dimensional data. Recently, slicing methods have shown to be a scalable approach to measuring mutual information (MI) between high-dimensional variables by projecting these variables into one-dimensional spaces. Unfortunately, these methods use uniform distributions of slicing directions, which generally discard informative features between variables and thus lead to inaccurate quantification of dependence. In this paper, we propose a principled framework that searches for an \textit{optimal} distribution of slices for MI. Importantly, we answer theoretical questions about finding the optimal slicing distribution in the context of MI and develop corresponding theoretical analyses. We also develop a practical algorithm, connecting our theoretical results with modern machine learning frameworks. Through comprehensive experiments in benchmark domains, we demonstrate significant gains in our information measure than state-of-the-art baselines. Ammar Fayad, Majd Ibrahim |
NeurIPS | 1 |