In adaptive bitrate streaming, resolution cross-over refers to the point on the convex hull where the encoding resolution should switch to achieve better quality. Accurate cross-over prediction is crucial for streaming providers to optimize resolution at given bandwidths. Most existing works rely on objective Video Quality Metrics (VQM), particularly VMAF, to determine the resolution cross-over. However, these metrics have limitations in accurately predicting resolution cross-overs. Furthermore, widely used VQMs are often trained on subjective datasets collected using the Absolute Category Rating (ACR) methodologies, which we demonstrate introduces significant uncertainty and errors in resolution cross-over predictions. To address these problems, we first investigate different subjective methodologies and demonstrate that Pairwise Comparison (PC) achieves better cross-over accuracy than ACR. We then propose a novel metric, Resolution Cross-over Quality Loss (RCQL), to measure the quality loss caused by resolution cross-over errors. Furthermore, we collected a new subjective dataset (LSCO) focusing on live streaming scenarios and evaluated widely used VQMs, by benchmarking their resolution cross-over accuracy.

In an adaptive bitrate streaming application, the efficiency of video compression and the encoded video quality depend on both the video codec and the quality metric used to perform encoding optimization. The development of such a quality metric need large scale subjective datasets. In this work we merge several datasets into one to support the creation of a metric tailored for video compression and scaling. We proposed a set of HEVC lightweight features to boost performance of the metrics. Our metrics can be computed from tightly coupled encoding process with 4% compute overhead or from the decoding process in real-time. The proposed method can achieve better correlation than VMAF and P.1204.3. It can extrapolate to different dynamic ranges, and is suitable for real-time video quality metrics delivery in the bitstream. The performance is verified by in-distribution and cross-dataset tests. This work paves the way for adaptive client-side heuristics, real-time segment optimization, dynamic bitrate capping, and quality-dependent post-processing neural network switching, etc.

We conducted a large-scale study of human perceptual quality judgments of High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) videos subjected to scaling and compression levels and viewed on three different display devices. While conventional expectations are that HDR quality is better than SDR quality, we have found subject preference of HDR versus SDR depends heavily on the display device, as well as on resolution scaling and bitrate. To study this question, we collected more than 23,000 quality ratings from 67 volunteers who watched 356 videos on OLED, QLED, and LCD televisions, and among many other findings, observed that HDR videos were often rated as lower quality than SDR videos at lower bitrates, particularly when viewed on LCD and QLED displays. Since it is of interest to be able to measure the quality of videos under these scenarios, e.g. to inform decisions regarding scaling, compression, and SDR vs HDR, we tested several well-known full-reference and no-reference video quality models on the new database. Towards advancing progress on this problem, we also developed a novel no-reference model called HDRPatchMAX, that uses a contrast-based analysis of classical and bit-depth features to predict quality more accurately than existing metrics.

Videos often have to be transmitted and stored at low bitrates due to poor network connectivity during adaptive bitrate streaming. Designing optimal bitrate ladders that would select the perceptually-optimized resolution, frame-rate, and compression level for low-bitrate videos for adaptive streaming across the internet is therefore a task of great interest. Towards that end, we conducted the first large-scale study of medium and low-bitrate videos from live sports for two codecs (Elemental AVC and HEVC) and created the Amazon Prime Video Low-Bitrate Sports (APV LBS) dataset. The study involved 94 participants and 742 videos, with more than 23,000 human opinion scores collected in total. We analyzed the data obtained and we also conducted an extensive evaluation of objective Video Quality Assessment (VQA) algorithms and benchmarked their performance, and make recommendations on bitrate ladder design. We're making the metadata and VQA features available at https://github.com/JoshuaEbenezer/lbmfr-public.