VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jizhou Wu
dblp:289/8553
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Multi-agent systems · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment › environment design
automatic curriculum learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PORTAL: Automatic Curricula Generation for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent coordination |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PORTAL: Automatic Curricula Generation for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PORTAL: Automatic Curricula Generation for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shared feature space · 0.8policy transfer · 0.8curriculum learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PORTAL: Automatic Curricula Generation for Multiagent Reinforcement LearningabstractDespite many breakthroughs in recent years, it is still hard for MultiAgent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) algorithms to directly solve complex tasks in MultiAgent Systems (MASs) from scratch. In this work, we study how to use Automatic Curriculum Learning (ACL) to reduce the number of environmental interactions required to learn a good policy. In order to solve a difficult task, ACL methods automatically select a sequence of tasks (i.e., curricula). The idea is to obtain maximum learning progress towards the final task by continuously learning on tasks that match the current capabilities of the learners. The key question is how to measure the learning progress of the learner for better curriculum selection. We propose a novel ACL framework, PrOgRessive mulTiagent Automatic curricuLum (PORTAL), for MASs. PORTAL selects curricula according to two critera: 1) How difficult is a task, relative to the learners’ current abilities? 2) How similar is a task, relative to the final task? By learning a shared feature space between tasks, PORTAL is able to characterize different tasks based on the distribution of features and select those that are similar to the final task. Also, the shared feature space can effectively facilitate the policy transfer between curricula. Experimental results show that PORTAL can train agents to master extremely hard cooperative tasks, which can not be achieved with previous state-of-the-art MARL algorithms. Jizhou Wu, Jianye Hao, Tianpei Yang, Xiaotian Hao, Yan Zheng 0002, Weixun Wang, Matthew E. Taylor |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Research of Knowledge Graph Technology and its Applications in Agricultural Information Consultation FieldabstractAs a hot research field of big data intelligence, knowledge graph is widely concerned and discussed in recent years. This thesis elaborated the definition and architecture of knowledge graph, the development drive and its importance, analyzed the seven technologies in the knowledge graph: knowledge acquisition, knowledge representation, knowledge storage, knowledge fusion, knowledge modeling, knowledge computation and knowledge operation and maintenance, and introduced and prospected the application of knowledge graph in the agricultural information consultation and the challenges faced in its future development. Jizhou Wu, Yingli Nie, Lihua Jiang, Ailian Zhou, Nengfu Xie |
IPCCC | 2 |