Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukas Gosch

dblp:289/9853 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 68% Graph learning · 29% Learning theory · 3%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
2.232025
Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning · ICLR 2025
Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions · NeurIPS 2023
Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
2.232025
Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning · ICLR 2025
Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions · NeurIPS 2023
Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.322023
Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions · NeurIPS 2023
Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.912025
Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.712023
Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
graph neural network robustness
0.712023
Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning · ICLR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence comparison
alignment-free sequence analysis
0.512021
DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignment · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.512021
DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignment · Bioinform. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel
0.312025
Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph diffusion
0.212023
Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural tangent kernel · 0.9mixed integer linear program · 0.9bi-level optimization · 0.9robustness evaluation · 0.7message passing · 0.7adversarial training · 0.7adversarial attack · 0.7sequence alignment · 0.5profile hidden markov model · 0.5deep convolutional neural network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Exact Certification of (Graph) Neural Networks Against Label Poisoning
abstract
Machine learning models are highly vulnerable to label flipping, i.e., the adversarial modification (poisoning) of training labels to compromise performance. Thus, deriving robustness certificates is important to guarantee that test predictions remain unaffected and to understand worst-case robustness behavior. However, for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), the problem of certifying label flipping has so far been unsolved. We change this by introducing an exact certification method, deriving both sample-wise and collective certificates. Our method leverages the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) to capture the training dynamics of wide networks enabling us to reformulate the bilevel optimization problem representing label flipping into a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP). We apply our method to certify a broad range of GNN architectures in node classification tasks. Thereby, concerning the worst-case robustness to label flipping: $(i)$ we establish hierarchies of GNNs on different benchmark graphs; $(ii)$ quantify the effect of architectural choices such as activations, depth and skip-connections; and surprisingly, $(iii)$ uncover a novel phenomenon of the robustness plateauing for intermediate perturbation budgets across all investigated datasets and architectures. While we focus on GNNs, our certificates are applicable to sufficiently wide NNs in general through their NTK. Thus, our work presents the first exact certificate to a poisoning attack ever derived for neural networks, which could be of independent interest. The code is available at https://github.com/saper0/qpcert.
Mahalakshmi Sabanayagam, Lukas Gosch, Stephan Günnemann, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
ICLR2
2023 Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learning
Lukas Gosch, Daniel Sturm 0002, Simon Geisler, Stephan Günnemann
ICLR1
2023 Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New Directions
abstract
Despite its success in the image domain, adversarial training did not (yet) stand out as an effective defense for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) against graph structure perturbations. In the pursuit of fixing adversarial training (1) we show and overcome fundamental theoretical as well as practical limitations of the adopted graph learning setting in prior work; (2) we reveal that flexible GNNs based on learnable graph diffusion are able to adjust to adversarial perturbations, while the learned message passing scheme is naturally interpretable; (3) we introduce the first attack for structure perturbations that, while targeting multiple nodes at once, is capable of handling global (graph-level) as well as local (node-level) constraints. Including these contributions, we demonstrate that adversarial training is a state-of-the-art defense against adversarial structure perturbations.
Lukas Gosch, Simon Geisler, Daniel Sturm 0002, Bertrand Charpentier, Daniel Zügner, Stephan Günnemann
NeurIPS1
2021 DeepNOG: fast and accurate protein orthologous group assignment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein orthologous group databases are powerful tools for evolutionary analysis, functional annotation or metabolic pathway modeling across lineages. Sequences are typically assigned to orthologous groups with alignment-based methods, such as profile hidden Markov models, which have become a computational bottleneck. RESULTS: We present DeepNOG, an extremely fast and accurate, alignment-free orthology assignment method based on deep convolutional networks. We compare DeepNOG against state-of-the-art alignment-based (HMMER, DIAMOND) and alignment-free methods (DeepFam) on two orthology databases (COG, eggNOG 5). DeepNOG can be scaled to large orthology databases like eggNOG, for which it outperforms DeepFam in terms of precision and recall by large margins. While alignment-based methods still provide the most accurate assignments among the investigated methods, computing time of DeepNOG is an order of magnitude lower on CPUs. Optional GPU usage further increases throughput massively. A command-line tool enables rapid adoption by users. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and packages are freely available at https://github.com/univieCUBE/deepnog. Install the platform-independent Python program with $pip install deepnog. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Roman Feldbauer, Lukas Gosch, Lukas Lüftinger, Patrick Hyden, Arthur Flexer, Thomas Rattei
Bioinform.2