Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thorsten Brants

dblp:29/1765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
25ranked-venue papers
14as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 22 · 12 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 48% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% Machine translation · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 93% Data stream processing · 7%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
class-based language modeling
0.112008
Distributed Word Clustering for Large Scale Class-Based Language Modeling in Machine Translation · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model
0.112008
Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
word clustering
0.112008
Distributed Word Clustering for Large Scale Class-Based Language Modeling in Machine Translation · ACL 2008
Information retrieval › document retrieval › temporal information retrieval
new event detection
0.122003
A System for new event detection · SIGIR 2003
Optimizing Story Link Detection is not Equivalent to Optimizing New Event Detection · ACL 2003
Information retrieval › text analysis › topic analysis
topic detection and tracking
0.122003
A System for new event detection · SIGIR 2003
Optimizing Story Link Detection is not Equivalent to Optimizing New Event Detection · ACL 2003
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
hashing
0.112008
Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
perfect hashing
0.112008
Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.021997
Tagging Grammatical Functions · EMNLP 1997
Tagset Reduction without Information Loss · ACL 1995
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.012007
Large Language Models in Machine Translation · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.011996
Better Language Models with Model Merging · EMNLP 1996
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.011996
Better Language Models with Model Merging · EMNLP 1996
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.011996
Better Language Models with Model Merging · EMNLP 1996
Data stream processing
document stream processing
0.012003
A System for new event detection · SIGIR 2003
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.011997
Tagging Grammatical Functions · EMNLP 1997
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
statistical language modeling
0.011995
Tagset Reduction without Information Loss · ACL 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perfect hash functions · 0.2distributed clustering · 0.1large language model · 0.1term reweighting · 0.0similarity score normalization · 0.0similarity measure · 0.0part-of-speech tagging · 0.0TF-IDF · 0.0sequence labeling · 0.0model merging · 0.0n-gram model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling
abstract
We propose a new benchmark corpus to be used for measuring progress in statistical language modeling. With almost one billion words of training data, we hope this benchmark will be useful to quickly evaluate novel language modeling techniques, and to compare their contribution when combined with other advanced techniques. We show performance of several well-known types of language models, with the best results achieved with a recurrent neural network based language model. The baseline unpruned Kneser-Ney 5-gram model achieves perplexity 67.6; a combination of techniques leads to 35% reduction in perplexity, or 10% reduction in cross-entropy (bits), over that baseline. The benchmark is available as a code.google.com project; besides the scripts needed to rebuild the training/held-out data, it also makes available log-probability values for each word in each of ten held-out data sets, for each of the baseline n-gram models.
Ciprian Chelba, Tomás Mikolov, Mike Schuster, Qi Ge, Thorsten Brants, Phillipp Koehn, Tony Robinson
INTERSPEECH5
2010 Study on interaction between entropy pruning and kneser-ney smoothing
abstract
The paper presents an in-depth analysis of a less known interaction between Kneser-Ney smoothing and entropy pruning that leads to severe degradation in language model performance under aggressive pruning regimes. Experiments in a data-rich setup such as google.com voice search show a significant impact in WER as well: pruning Kneser-Ney and Katz models to 0.1 % of their original impacts speech recognition accuracy significantly, approx. 10 % relative. 1.
Ciprian Chelba, Thorsten Brants, Will Neveitt
INTERSPEECH2
2010 Query language modeling for voice search
abstract
The paper presents an empirical exploration of google.com query stream language modeling. We describe the normalization of the typed query stream resulting in out-of-vocabulary (OoV) rates below 1% for a one million word vocabulary. We present a comprehensive set of experiments that guided the design decisions for a voice search service. In the process we re-discovered a less known interaction between Kneser-Ney smoothing and entropy pruning, and found empirical evidence that hints at non-stationarity of the query stream, as well as strong dependence on various English locales-USA, Britain and Australia.
Ciprian Chelba, Johan Schalkwyk, Thorsten Brants, Vida Ha, Boulos Harb, Will Neveitt, Carolina Parada
SLT3
2008 Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions
David Talbot, Thorsten Brants
ACL2
2008 Distributed Word Clustering for Large Scale Class-Based Language Modeling in Machine Translation
Jakob Uszkoreit, Thorsten Brants
ACL2
2007 Large Language Models in Machine Translation
Thorsten Brants, Ashok C. Popat, Franz Josef Och, Jeffrey Dean
EMNLP-CoNLL1
2006 A Context Pattern Induction Method for Named Entity Extraction
Partha P. Talukdar, Thorsten Brants, Mark Y. Liberman, Fernando Pereira 0003
CoNLL2
2005 Test Data Likelihood for PLSA Models
Thorsten Brants
Inf. Retr.1
2004 Multiple Similarity Measures and Source-Pair Information in Story Link Detection
Francine Chen 0001, Ayman Farahat, Thorsten Brants
HLT-NAACL3
2003 Optimizing Story Link Detection is not Equivalent to Optimizing New Event Detection
abstract
Link detection has been regarded as a core technology for the Topic Detection and Tracking tasks of new event detection. In this paper we formulate story link detection and new event detection as information retrieval task and hypothesize on the impact of precision and recall on both systems. Motivated by these arguments, we introduce a number of new performance enhancing techniques including part of speech tagging, new similarity measures and expanded stop lists. Experimental results validate our hypothesis.
Ayman Farahat, Francine Chen 0001, Thorsten Brants
ACL3
2003 Story Link Detection and New Event Detection are Asymmetric
Francine Chen 0001, Ayman Farahat, Thorsten Brants
HLT-NAACL3
2003 A System for new event detection
abstract
We present a new method and system for performing the New Event Detection task, i.e., in one or multiple streams of news stories, all stories on a previously unseen (new) event are marked. The method is based on an incremental TF-IDF model. Our extensions include: generation of source-specific models, similarity score normalization based on document-specific averages, similarity score normalization based on source-pair specific averages, term reweighting based on inverse event frequencies, and segmentation of the documents. We also report on extensions that did not improve results. The system performs very well on TDT3 and TDT4 test data and scored second in the TDT-2002 evaluation.
Thorsten Brants, Francine Chen 0001
SIGIR1
2002 Topic-based document segmentation with probabilistic latent semantic analysis
abstract
This paper presents a new method for topic-based document segmentation, i.e., the identification of boundaries between parts of a document that bear on different topics. The method combines the use of the Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA) model with the method of selecting segmentation points based on the similarity values between pairs of adjacent blocks. The use of PLSA allows for a better representation of sparse information in a text block, such as a sentence or a sequence of sentences. Furthermore, segmentation performance is improved by combining different instantiations of the same model, either using different random initializations or different numbers of latent classes. Results on commonly available data sets are significantly better than those of other state-of-the-art systems.
Thorsten Brants, Francine Chen 0001, Ioannis Tsochantaridis
CIKM1
2002 The LinGO Redwoods Treebank: Motivation and Preliminary Applications
Stephan Oepen, Kristina Toutanova, Stuart M. Shieber, Christopher D. Manning, Dan Flickinger, Thorsten Brants
COLING6
2000 Probabilistic Parsing and Psychological Plausibility
Thorsten Brants, Matthew W. Crocker
COLING1
2000 Inter-annotator Agreement for a German Newspaper Corpus
Thorsten Brants
LREC1
2000 Interactive Corpus Annotation
Thorsten Brants, Oliver Plaehn
LREC1
1999 Cascaded Markov Models
Thorsten Brants
EACL1
1998 Automation of Treebank Annotation
Thorsten Brants, Wojciech Skut
CoNLL1
1998 A lingnistically interpreted corpus of German newspaper text
Wojciech Skut, Thorsten Brants, Brigitte Krenn, Hans Uszkoreit
LREC2
1997 Tagging Grammatical Functions
Thorsten Brants, Wojciech Skut, Brigitte Krenn
EMNLP1
1997 Internal and external tagsets in part-of-speech tagging
abstract
We present an approach to statistical partof -speech tagging that uses two different tagsets, one for its internal and one for its external representation. The internal tagset is used in the underlying Markov model, while the external tagset constitutes the output of the tagger. The internal tagset can be modified and optimized to increase tagging accuracy (with respect to the external tagset). We evaluate this approach in an experiment and show that it performs significantly better than approaches using only one tagset. 1 Introduction The task of part-of-speech tagging is to assign a unique syntactical category (part-of-speech tag) to each word of an input stream. It is used as a component in parsing, for recognition in message extraction systems, for generating intonation in speech production systems, and many others. Our work focuses on statistical part-of-speech tagging that is based on an underlying n-gram or Markov model. Tags are assigned by maximization of lexica...
Thorsten Brants
EUROSPEECH1
1996 Better Language Models with Model Merging
Thorsten Brants
EMNLP1
1996 Estimating Markov model structures
abstract
We i n v estigate the derivation of Markov model structures from text corpora.The structure of a Markov model is its number of states plus the set of outputs and transitions with non-zero probability.The domain of the investigated models is part-of-speech tagging.Our investigations concern two methods to derive Markov models and their structures.Both are able to form categories and allow w ords to belong to more than one of them.The rst method is model merging, which starts with a large and corpus-specic model and successively merges states to generate smaller and more general models.The second method is model splitting, which is the inverse procedure and starts with a small and general model.States are successively split to generate larger and more specic models.In an experiment, we show that the combination of these techniques yields tagging accuracies that are at least equivalent to those of standard approaches. 1
Thorsten Brants
ICSLP1
1995 Tagset Reduction without Information Loss
abstract
A technique for reducing a tagset used for n-gram part-of-speech disambiguation is introduced and evaluated in an experiment.The technique ensures that all information that is provided by the original tagset can be restored from the reduced one.This is crucial, since we are interested in the linguistically motivated tags for part-of-speech disambiguation.The reduced tagset needs fewer parameters for its statistical model and allows more accurate parameter estimation.Additionally, there is a slight but not significant improvement of tagging accuracy.
Thorsten Brants
ACL1