Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Vainsencher

dblp:29/2216 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Optimization for machine learning · 22% Learning theory · 13%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 87% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 13%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › outlier robustness
outlier-robust estimation
0.312017
Ignoring Is a Bliss: Learning with Large Noise Through Reweighting-Minimization · COLT 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
reweighting
0.312017
Ignoring Is a Bliss: Learning with Large Noise Through Reweighting-Minimization · COLT 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312017
Ignoring Is a Bliss: Learning with Large Noise Through Reweighting-Minimization · COLT 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
empirical risk minimization
0.212015
Local Smoothness in Variance Reduced Optimization · NIPS 2015
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.212015
Local Smoothness in Variance Reduced Optimization · NIPS 2015
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction
0.212015
Local Smoothness in Variance Reduced Optimization · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
mixture model learning
0.212013
Learning Multiple Models via Regularized Weighting · NIPS 2013
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
robust estimation
0.212013
Learning Multiple Models via Regularized Weighting · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning
0.112011
The Sample Complexity of Dictionary Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.112011
The Sample Complexity of Dictionary Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.012013
Learning Multiple Models via Regularized Weighting · NIPS 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularized weighting · 0.3lloyd's algorithm · 0.3expectation-maximization · 0.3reweighting · 0.3empirical loss minimization · 0.3convergence analysis · 0.3non-uniform sampling · 0.2SVRG · 0.2SDCA · 0.2online learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Ignoring Is a Bliss: Learning with Large Noise Through Reweighting-Minimization
abstract
We consider learning in the presence of arbitrary noise that can overwhelm the signal in terms of magnitude on a fraction of data points observed (aka outliers). Standard approaches based on minimizing empirical loss can fail miserably and lead to arbitrary bad solutions in this setting. We propose an approach that iterates between finding a solution with minimal empirical loss and re-weighting the data, reinforcing data points where the previous solution works well. We show that our approach can handle arbitrarily large noise, is robust as having a non-trivial breakdown point, and converges linearly under certain conditions. The intuitive idea of our approach is to automatically exclude “difficult” data points from model fitting. More importantly (and perhaps surprisingly), we validate this intuition by establishing guarantees for generalization and iteration complexity that \em essentially ignore the presence of outliers
Daniel Vainsencher, Shie Mannor, Huan Xu 0001
COLT1
2015 Local Smoothness in Variance Reduced Optimization
abstract
Abstract We propose a family of non-uniform sampling strategies to provably speed up a class of stochastic optimization algorithms with linear convergence including Stochastic Variance Reduced Gradient (SVRG) and Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent (SDCA). For a large family of penalized empirical risk minimization problems, our methods exploit data dependent local smoothness of the loss functions near the optimum, while maintaining convergence guarantees. Our bounds are the first to quantify the advantage gained from local smoothness which are significant for some problems significantly better. Empirically, we provide thorough numerical results to back up our theory. Additionally we present algorithms exploiting local smoothness in more aggressive ways, which perform even better in practice.
Daniel Vainsencher, Han Liu 0001, Tong Zhang 0001
NIPS1
2013 Learning Multiple Models via Regularized Weighting
abstract
We consider the general problem of Multiple Model Learning (MML) from data, from the statistical and algorithmic perspectives; this problem includes clustering, multiple regression and subspace clustering as special cases. A common approach to solving new MML problems is to generalize Lloyd's algorithm for clustering (or Expectation-Maximization for soft clustering). However this approach is unfortunately sensitive to outliers and large noise: a single exceptional point may take over one of the models. We propose a different general formulation that seeks for each model a distribution over data points; the weights are regularized to be sufficiently spread out. This enhances robustness by making assumptions on class balance. We further provide generalization bounds and explain how the new iterations may be computed efficiently. We demonstrate the robustness benefits of our approach with some experimental results and prove for the important case of clustering that our approach has a non-trivial breakdown point, i.e., is guaranteed to be robust to a fixed percentage of adversarial unbounded outliers.
Daniel Vainsencher, Shie Mannor, Huan Xu 0001
NIPS1
2011 Bundle Selling by Online Estimation of Valuation Functions
Daniel Vainsencher, Ofer Dekel, Shie Mannor
ICML1
2011 The Sample Complexity of Dictionary Learning
Daniel Vainsencher, Shie Mannor, Alfred M. Bruckstein
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2008 On isoperimetrically optimal polyforms
Daniel Vainsencher, Alfred M. Bruckstein
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2004 MudPie: layers in the ball of mud
Daniel Vainsencher
Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct.1