Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Ilse C. F. Ipsen

dblp:29/5833 · also Ilse Ipsen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5645-5854ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation
iterative linear solver
0.512021
Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Mathematical optimization
uncertainty quantification
0.512021
Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic inference · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems
abstract
This paper presents a probabilistic perspective on iterative methods for approximating the solution $\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^d$ of a nonsingular linear system $\mathbf{A} \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}$. Classically, an iterative method produces a sequence $\mathbf{x}_m$ of approximations that converge to $\mathbf{x}$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Our approach, instead, lifts a standard iterative method to act on the set of probability distributions, $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, outputting a sequence of probability distributions $\mu_m \in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The output of a probabilistic iterative method can provide both a "best guess" for $\mathbf{x}$, for example by taking the mean of $\mu_m$, and also probabilistic uncertainty quantification for the value of $\mathbf{x}$ when it has not been exactly determined. A comprehensive theoretical treatment is presented in the case of a stationary linear iterative method, where we characterise both the rate of contraction of $\mu_m$ to an atomic measure on $\mathbf{x}$ and the nature of the uncertainty quantification being provided. We conclude with an empirical illustration that highlights the potential for probabilistic iterative methods to provide insight into solution uncertainty.
Jon Cockayne, Ilse C. F. Ipsen, Chris J. Oates, Tim W. Reid
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2