VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ilse C. F. Ipsen
dblp:29/5833 · also Ilse Ipsen
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5645-5854ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation
iterative linear solver |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
uncertainty quantification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic inference · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Probabilistic Iterative Methods for Linear SystemsabstractThis paper presents a probabilistic perspective on iterative methods for approximating the solution $\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^d$ of a nonsingular linear system $\mathbf{A} \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}$. Classically, an iterative method produces a sequence $\mathbf{x}_m$ of approximations that converge to $\mathbf{x}$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Our approach, instead, lifts a standard iterative method to act on the set of probability distributions, $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, outputting a sequence of probability distributions $\mu_m \in \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The output of a probabilistic iterative method can provide both a "best guess" for $\mathbf{x}$, for example by taking the mean of $\mu_m$, and also probabilistic uncertainty quantification for the value of $\mathbf{x}$ when it has not been exactly determined. A comprehensive theoretical treatment is presented in the case of a stationary linear iterative method, where we characterise both the rate of contraction of $\mu_m$ to an atomic measure on $\mathbf{x}$ and the nature of the uncertainty quantification being provided. We conclude with an empirical illustration that highlights the potential for probabilistic iterative methods to provide insight into solution uncertainty. Jon Cockayne, Ilse C. F. Ipsen, Chris J. Oates, Tim W. Reid |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |