Unit testing is critical for ensuring software quality and software system stability. The current practice of manually maintaining unit tests suffers from low efficiency and the risk of delayed or overlooked fixes. Therefore, an automated approach is required to instantly update unit tests, with the capability to both repair and enhance unit tests. However, existing automated test maintenance methods primarily focus on repairing broken tests, neglecting the scenario of enhancing existing tests to verify new functionality. Meanwhile, due to their reliance on rule-based context collection and the lack of verification mechanisms, existing approaches struggle to handle complex code changes and often produce test cases with low correctness.To address these challenges, we propose TestUpdater, a novel Large Language Model (LLM) based approach that enables automated just-in-time test updates in response to production code changes. By emulating the reasoning process of developers, TestUpdater first leverages the LLM to analyze code changes and identify relevant context, which it then extracts and filters. This LLM-driven context collector can flexibly gather accurate and sufficient context, enabling better handling of complex code changes. Then, through carefully designed prompts, TestUpdater guides the LLM step by step to handle various types of code changes and introduce new dependencies, enabling both the repair of broken tests and the enhancement of tests. Finally, emulating the debugging process, we introduce an error-type-aware iterative refinement mechanism that executes the LLM-updated tests and repairs failures, which significantly improves the overall correctness of test updates.Since existing test repair datasets lack scenarios of test enhancement, we further construct a new benchmark, Updates4J, with 195 real-world samples from 7 projects, enabling execution-based evaluation of test updates. Experimental results show that TestUpdater achieves a compilation pass rate of 94.4% and a test pass rate of 86.7%, outperforming the state-of-the-art method Synter by 15.9% and 20.0%, respectively. Furthermore, TestUpdater exhibits 12.9% higher branch coverage and 15.2% greater line coverage than Synter.