VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kazi Sajeed Mehrab
dblp:290/2015
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-1405-225XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Vision and language · 21% Image recognition and object detection · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 74% Environmental and earth informatics · 26% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
class activation map |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained Analysis · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained Analysis · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained Analysis · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
prototype learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What Do You See in Common? Learning Hierarchical Prototypes over Tree-of-Life to Discover Evolutionary Traits · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
vision transformer explainability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained Analysis · CVPR 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics
biodiversity informatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fish-Vista: A Multi-Purpose Dataset for Understanding & Identification of Traits from Images · CVPR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
evolutionary biology |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What Do You See in Common? Learning Hierarchical Prototypes over Tree-of-Life to Discover Evolutionary Traits · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fish-Vista: A Multi-Purpose Dataset for Understanding & Identification of Traits from Images · CVPR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency Detection · EMNLP 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency Detection · EMNLP 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological Images · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Fish-Vista: A Multi-Purpose Dataset for Understanding & Identification of Traits from Images · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
long-tailed recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Fish-Vista: A Multi-Purpose Dataset for Understanding & Identification of Traits from Images · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
pre-trained vision-language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological Images · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
vision-language model hallucination |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological Images · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
over-specificity loss · 1.7machine learning · 1.7computer vision · 1.7prompting techniques · 1.5visual prompt tuning · 0.9prototypical networks · 0.9prototypical network · 0.9multi-head attention · 0.9class-specific prompt learning · 0.9zero-shot evaluation · 0.8multimodal document reasoning · 0.8claim synthesis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained AnalysisabstractWe present a simple approach to make pre-trained Vision Transformers (ViTs) interpretable for fine-grained analysis, aiming to identify and localize the traits that distinguish visually similar categories, such as bird species. Pretrained ViTs, such as DINO, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in extracting localized, discriminative features. However, saliency maps like Grad-CAM often fail to identify these traits, producing blurred, coarse heatmaps that highlight entire objects instead. We propose a novel approach, Prompt Class Attention Map (Prompt-CAM), to address this limitation. Prompt-CAM learns class-specific prompts for a pre-trained ViT and uses the corresponding outputs for classification. To correctly classify an image, the true-class prompt must attend to unique image patches not present in other classes’ images (i.e., traits). As a result, the true class’s multi-head attention maps reveal traits and their locations. Implementation-wise, Prompt-CAM is almost a "free lunch," requiring only a modification to the prediction head of Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT). This makes Prompt-CAM easy to train and apply, in stark contrast to other interpretable methods that require designing specific models and training processes. Extensive empirical studies on a dozen datasets from various domains (e.g., birds, fishes, insects, fungi, flowers, food, and cars) validate the superior interpretation capability of Prompt-CAM. The source code and demo are available at https://github.com/Imageomics/Prompt_CAM. Arpita Chowdhury, Dipanjyoti Paul, Zheda Mai, Jianyang Gu, Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, Elizabeth G. Campolongo, Daniel I. Rubenstein, Charles V. Stewart, Anuj Karpatne, Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf, Yu Su 0001, Wei-Lun Chao |
CVPR | 6 |
| 2025 | Fish-Vista: A Multi-Purpose Dataset for Understanding & Identification of Traits from ImagesabstractWe introduce Fish-Visual Trait Analysis (Fish-Vista), the first organismal image dataset designed for the analysis of visual traits of aquatic species directly from images using machine learning and computer vision methods. Fish-Vista contains 69,269 annotated images spanning 4,316 fish species, curated and organized to serve three downstream tasks: species classification, trait identification, and trait segmentation. Our work makes two key contributions. First, we provide a fully reproducible data processing pipeline to process fish images sourced from various museum collections, contributing to the advancement of AI in biodiversity science. We annotate the images with carefully curated labels from biological databases and manual annotations to create an AI-ready dataset of visual traits. Second, our work offers fertile grounds for researchers to develop novel methods for a variety of problems in computer vision such as handling long-tailed distributions, out-of-distribution generalization, learning with weak labels, explainable AI, and segmenting small objects. Dataset and code for Fish-Vista are available at https://github.com/Imageomics/Fish-Vista Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, M. Maruf, Arka Daw, Abhilash Neog, Harish Babu Manogaran, Mridul Khurana, Zhenyang Feng, Bahadir Altintas, Yasin Bakis, Elizabeth G. Campolongo, Matthew J. Thompson, Hilmar Lapp, Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf, Paula M. Mabee, Henry L. Bart Jr., Wei-Lun Chao, Wasila M. Dahdul, Anuj Karpatne |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | What Do You See in Common? Learning Hierarchical Prototypes over Tree-of-Life to Discover Evolutionary TraitsabstractA grand challenge in biology is to discover evolutionary traits---features of organisms common to a group of species with a shared ancestor in the tree of life (also referred to as phylogenetic tree). With the growing availability of image repositories in biology, there is a tremendous opportunity to discover evolutionary traits directly from images in the form of a hierarchy of prototypes. However, current prototype-based methods are mostly designed to operate over a flat structure of classes and face several challenges in discovering hierarchical prototypes, including the issue of learning over-specific prototypes at internal nodes. To overcome these challenges, we introduce the framework of Hierarchy aligned Commonality through Prototypical Networks (HComP-Net). The key novelties in HComP-Net include a novel over-specificity loss to avoid learning over-specific prototypes, a novel discriminative loss to ensure prototypes at an internal node are absent in the contrasting set of species with different ancestry, and a novel masking module to allow for the exclusion of over-specific prototypes at higher levels of the tree without hampering classification performance. We empirically show that HComP-Net learns prototypes that are accurate, semantically consistent, and generalizable to unseen species in comparison to baselines. Our code is publicly accessible at Imageomics Institute Github site: https://github.com/Imageomics/HComPNet. Harish Babu Manogaran, M. Maruf, Arka Daw, Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, Caleb Charpentier, Josef C. Uyeda, Wasila M. Dahdul, Matthew J. Thompson, Elizabeth G. Campolongo, Kaiya Provost, Wei-Lun Chao, Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf, Paula M. Mabee, Hilmar Lapp, Anuj Karpatne |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | M3D: MultiModal MultiDocument Fine-Grained Inconsistency DetectionabstractValidating claims from misinformation is a highly challenging task that involves understanding how each factual assertion within the claim relates to a set of trusted source materials. Existing approaches often make coarse-grained predictions but fail to identify the specific aspects of the claim that are troublesome and the specific evidence relied upon. In this paper, we introduce a method and new benchmark for this challenging task. Our method predicts the fine-grained logical relationship of each aspect of the claim from a set of multimodal documents, which include text, image(s), video(s), and audio(s). We also introduce a new benchmark (M^3DC) of claims requiring multimodal multidocument reasoning, which we construct using a novel claim synthesis technique. Experiments show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on this challenging task on two benchmarks while providing finer-grained predictions, explanations, and evidence. Chia-Wei Tang, Ting-Chih Chen, Kiet Nguyen, Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, Alvi Md. Ishmam, Christopher Thomas 0004 |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | VLM4Bio: A Benchmark Dataset to Evaluate Pretrained Vision-Language Models for Trait Discovery from Biological ImagesabstractImages are increasingly becoming the currency for documenting biodiversity on the planet, providing novel opportunities for accelerating scientific discoveries in the field of organismal biology, especially with the advent of large vision-language models (VLMs). We ask if pre-trained VLMs can aid scientists in answering a range of biologically relevant questions without any additional fine-tuning. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of $12$ state-of-the-art (SOTA) VLMs in the field of organismal biology using a novel dataset, VLM4Bio, consisting of $469K$ question-answer pairs involving $30K$ images from three groups of organisms: fishes, birds, and butterflies, covering five biologically relevant tasks. We also explore the effects of applying prompting techniques and tests for reasoning hallucination on the performance of VLMs, shedding new light on the capabilities of current SOTA VLMs in answering biologically relevant questions using images. M. Maruf, Arka Daw, Kazi Sajeed Mehrab, Harish Babu Manogaran, Abhilash Neog, Medha Sawhney, Mridul Khurana, James P. Balhoff, Yasin Bakis, Bahadir Altintas, Matthew J. Thompson, Elizabeth G. Campolongo, Josef C. Uyeda, Hilmar Lapp, Henry L. Bart Jr., Paula M. Mabee, Yu Su 0001, Wei-Lun Chao, Charles V. Stewart, Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf, Wasila M. Dahdul, Anuj Karpatne |
NeurIPS | 3 |