Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David J. Gonon
dblp:290/6709
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › social navigation
crowd navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Crowd against the machine: A simulation-based benchmark tool to evaluate and compare robot capabilities to navigate a human crowd · ICRA 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Crowd against the machine: A simulation-based benchmark tool to evaluate and compare robot capabilities to navigate a human crowd · ICRA 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
simulation-based evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Crowd against the machine: A simulation-based benchmark tool to evaluate and compare robot capabilities to navigate a human crowd · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 1.0evaluation metrics · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Pedestrian-Robot Interactions on Autonomous Crowd Navigation: Reactive Control Methods and Evaluation MetricsabstractAutonomous navigation in highly populated areas remains a challenging task for robots because of the difficulty in guaranteeing safe interactions with pedestrians in unstructured situations. In this work, we present a crowd navigation control framework that delivers continuous obstacle avoidance and post-contact control evaluated on an autonomous personal mobility vehicle. We propose evaluation metrics for accounting efficiency, controller response and crowd interactions in natural crowds. We report the results of over 110 trials in different crowd types: sparse, flows, and mixed traffic, with low- (< 0.15 ppsm), mid- (< 0.65 ppsm), and high- (< 1 ppsm) pedestrian densities. We present comparative results between two low-level obstacle avoidance methods and a baseline of shared control. Results show a 10% drop in relative time to goal on the highest density tests, and no other efficiency metric decrease. Moreover, autonomous navigation showed to be comparable to shared-control navigation with a lower relative jerk and significantly higher fluency in commands indicating high compatibility with the crowd. We conclude that the reactive controller fulfils a necessary task of fast and continuous adaptation to crowd navigation, and it should be coupled with high-level planners for environmental and situational awareness. Diego Felipe Paez Granados, Yujie He 0002, David J. Gonon, Dan Jia, Bastian Leibe, Kenji Suzuki 0002, Aude Billard |
IROS | 3 |
| 2021 | Crowd against the machine: A simulation-based benchmark tool to evaluate and compare robot capabilities to navigate a human crowdabstractThe evaluation of robot capabilities to navigate human crowds is essential to conceive new robots intended to operate in public spaces. This paper initiates the development of a benchmark tool to evaluate such capabilities; our long term vision is to provide the community with a simulation tool that generates virtual crowded environment to test robots, to establish standard scenarios and metrics to evaluate navigation techniques in terms of safety and efficiency, and thus, to install new methods to benchmarking robots’ crowd navigation capabilities. This paper presents the architecture of the simulation tools, introduces first scenarios and evaluation metrics, as well as early results to demonstrate that our solution is relevant to be used as a benchmark tool. Fabien Grzeskowiak, David J. Gonon, Daniel Dugas, Diego Felipe Paez Granados, Jen Jen Chung, Juan I. Nieto 0001, Roland Siegwart, Aude Billard, Marie Babel, Julien Pettré |
ICRA | 2 |