Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Baylon
dblp:290/8026
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
event relation extraction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Event Semantic Relations · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
event relation reasoning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Event Semantic Relations · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Event Semantic Relations · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reading comprehension dataset construction · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Event Semantic RelationsabstractUnderstanding how events are semantically related to each other is the essence of reading comprehension.Recent event-centric reading comprehension datasets focus mostly on event arguments or temporal relations.While these tasks partially evaluate machines' ability of narrative understanding, human-like reading comprehension requires the capability to process event-based information beyond arguments and temporal reasoning.For example, to understand causality between events, we need to infer motivation or purpose; to establish event hierarchy, we need to understand the composition of events.To facilitate these tasks, we introduce ESTER, a comprehensive machine reading comprehension (MRC) dataset for Event Semantic Relation Reasoning.The dataset leverages natural language queries to reason about the five most common event semantic relations, provides more than 6K questions, and captures 10.1K event relation pairs.Experimental results show that the current SOTA systems achieve 22.1%, 63.3% and 83.5% for token-based exact-match (EM), F 1 and event-based HIT@1 scores, which are all significantly below human performances (36.0%, 79.6%, 100% respectively), highlighting our dataset as a challenging benchmark.1 Rujun Han, I-Hung Hsu, Jiao Sun, Julia Baylon, Qiang Ning, Dan Roth 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |