VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matteo Gabburo
dblp:290/8136
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-6214-3689ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 75% Language models and text generation · 20% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
answer generation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Learning Answer Generation using Supervision from Automatic Question Answering Evaluators · ACL (1) 2023 Knowledge Transfer from Answer Ranking to Answer Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Answer Generation using Supervision from Automatic Question Answering Evaluators · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Answer Generation using Supervision from Automatic Question Answering Evaluators · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › answer extraction
answer sentence selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Transfer from Answer Ranking to Answer Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Transfer from Answer Ranking to Answer Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 1.2supervision transfer · 0.7generator loss weighting · 0.7loss weighting · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning Answer Generation using Supervision from Automatic Question Answering EvaluatorsabstractRecent studies show that sentence-level extractive QA, i.e., based on Answer Sentence Selection (AS2), is outperformed by Generationbased QA (GenQA) models, which generate answers using the top-k answer sentences ranked by AS2 models (a la retrieval-augmented generation style).In this paper, we propose a novel training paradigm for GenQA using supervision from automatic QA evaluation models (GAVA).Specifically, we propose three strategies to transfer knowledge from these QA evaluation models to a GenQA model: (i) augmenting training data with answers generated by the GenQA model and labelled by GAVA (either statically, before training, or (ii) dynamically, at every training epoch); and (iii) using the GAVA score for weighting the generator loss during the learning of the GenQA model.We evaluate our proposed methods on two academic and one industrial dataset, obtaining a significant improvement in answering accuracy over the previous state of the art. Matteo Gabburo, Siddhant Garg, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Alessandro Moschitti |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | Knowledge Transfer from Answer Ranking to Answer GenerationabstractRecent studies show that Question Answering (QA) based on Answer Sentence Selection (AS2) can be improved by generating an improved answer from the top-k ranked answer sentences (termed GenQA).This allows for synthesizing the information from multiple candidates into a concise, natural-sounding answer.However, creating large-scale supervised training data for GenQA models is very challenging.In this paper, we propose to train a GenQA model by transferring knowledge from a trained AS2 model, to overcome the aforementioned issue.First, we use an AS2 model to produce a ranking over answer candidates for a set of questions.Then, we use the top ranked candidate as the generation target, and the next k top ranked candidates as context for training a GenQA model.We also propose to use the AS2 model prediction scores for loss weighting and score-conditioned input/output shaping, to aid the knowledge transfer.Our evaluation on three public and one large industrial datasets demonstrates the superiority of our approach over the AS2 baseline, and GenQA trained using supervised data. Matteo Gabburo, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Siddhant Garg, Luca Soldaini, Alessandro Moschitti |
EMNLP | 1 |