Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lauren E. Chan

dblp:290/8184 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 62% Computational science and engineering · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
biological knowledge graph
0.712023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023
Computational science and engineering
graph learning
0.212023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023
Computational science and engineering › graph learning
link prediction
0.212023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

node embedding · 0.7graph machine learning · 0.7extract-transform-load · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs
abstract
MOTIVATION: Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of KGs is lacking. RESULTS: Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of KGs. Features include a simple, modular extract-transform-load pattern for producing graphs compliant with Biolink Model (a high-level data model for standardizing biological data), easy integration of any OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies) ontology, cached downloads of upstream data sources, versioned and automatically updated builds with stable URLs, web-browsable storage of KG artifacts on cloud infrastructure, and easy reuse of transformed subgraphs across projects. Current KG-Hub projects span use cases including COVID-19 research, drug repurposing, microbial-environmental interactions, and rare disease research. KG-Hub is equipped with tooling to easily analyze and manipulate KGs. KG-Hub is also tightly integrated with graph machine learning (ML) tools which allow automated graph ML, including node embeddings and training of models for link prediction and node classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://kghub.org.
J. Harry Caufield, Tim E. Putman, Kevin Schaper, Deepak R. Unni, Harshad Hegde, Tiffany Callahan, Luca Cappelletti, Sierra A. T. Moxon, Vida Ravanmehr, Seth Carbon, Lauren E. Chan, Katherina G. Cortes, Kent A. Shefchek, Glass Elsarboukh, James P. Balhoff, Tommaso Fontana, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Richard M. Bruskiewich, Anne E. Thessen, Nomi L. Harris, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Melissa A. Haendel, Peter N. Robinson, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Chris Mungall, Justin T. Reese
Bioinform.11
2023 A method for comparing multiple imputation techniques: A case study on the U.S. national COVID cohort collaborative
abstract
Healthcare datasets obtained from Electronic Health Records have proven to be extremely useful for assessing associations between patients' predictors and outcomes of interest. However, these datasets often suffer from missing values in a high proportion of cases, whose removal may introduce severe bias. Several multiple imputation algorithms have been proposed to attempt to recover the missing information under an assumed missingness mechanism. Each algorithm presents strengths and weaknesses, and there is currently no consensus on which multiple imputation algorithm works best in a given scenario. Furthermore, the selection of each algorithm's parameters and data-related modeling choices are also both crucial and challenging. In this paper we propose a novel framework to numerically evaluate strategies for handling missing data in the context of statistical analysis, with a particular focus on multiple imputation techniques. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach on a large cohort of type-2 diabetes patients provided by the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Enclave, where we explored the influence of various patient characteristics on outcomes related to COVID-19. Our analysis included classic multiple imputation techniques as well as simple complete-case Inverse Probability Weighted models. Extensive experiments show that our approach can effectively highlight the most promising and performant missing-data handling strategy for our case study. Moreover, our methodology allowed a better understanding of the behavior of the different models and of how it changed as we modified their parameters. Our method is general and can be applied to different research fields and on datasets containing heterogeneous types.
Elena Casiraghi, Rachel Wong, Margaret Hall, Ben D. Coleman, Marco Notaro, Michael D. Evans, Jena S. Tronieri, Hannah Blau, Bryan Laraway, Tiffany Callahan, Lauren E. Chan, Carolyn T. Bramante, John B. Buse, Richard A. Moffitt, Til Sturmer, Steven G. Johnson, Yu Raymond Shao, Justin T. Reese, Peter N. Robinson, Alberto Paccanaro, Giorgio Valentini, Jared D. Huling, Kenneth Wilkins
J. Biomed. Informatics11