Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Md. Atabuzzaman

dblp:291/4477 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0635-7073ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 45% Vision and language · 41% Language models and text generation · 14%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering
0.912025
Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
selection bias
0.912025
Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › debiasing
selection bias mitigation
0.912025
Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.912025
Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark
0.812024
JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.812024
JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
hallucination evaluation
0.212024
JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.212024
JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logit-level debiasing · 0.9large vision-language model · 0.9human annotation · 0.8benchmark construction · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Attention-Based Code Summarization for Multi-label Vulnerability Detection
Maksuda Bilkis Baby, Md. Atabuzzaman, Md Shajalal, Gunnar Stevens
CANS2
2025 Benchmarking and Mitigating MCQA Selection Bias of Large Vision-Language Models
abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved strong performance on visionlanguage tasks, particularly Visual Question Answering (VQA).While prior work has explored unimodal biases in VQA, the problem of selection bias in Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA), where models may favor specific option tokens (e.g., "A") or positions, remains underexplored.In this paper, we investigate both the presence and nature of selection bias in LVLMs through fine-grained MCQA benchmarks spanning easy, medium, and hard difficulty levels, defined by the semantic similarity of the options.We further propose an inference-time logit-level debiasing method that estimates an ensemble bias vector from general and contextual prompts and applies confidence-adaptive corrections to the model's output.Our method mitigates bias without retraining and is compatible with frozen LVLMs.Extensive experiments across several state-ofthe-art models reveal consistent selection biases that intensify with task difficulty, and show that our mitigation approach significantly reduces bias while improving accuracy in challenging settings.This work offers new insights into the limitations of LVLMs in MCQA and presents a practical approach to improve their robustness in fine-grained visual reasoning.Datasets and code are available at: https://github.com/ Atabuzzaman/Selection-Bias-of-LVLMs Yellow-headed Blackbird B. This image shows a Yellow-headed Blackbird bird which has a black body, bright yellow head… C.This is a Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Convertible 2012 car which has a distinctive… D. This image shows a hot and sour soup food item which has a rich broth, egg strands, tofu, and … A. This image shows a Yellow-headed Blackbird bird which has a black body, bright yellow head… B. This image shows a Brown Creeper bird with small, dark eyes, a slender, upturned beak, and… C.This image shows a Florida Jay bird which has a small, blue-gray body, a white chest and belly… D. This image shows a Tree Sparrow bird which has a brown and white body, a chestnut cap … A. This image shows a Rusty Blackbird bird which has rusty-brown plumage in non-breeding… B This image shows a Red-winged Blackbird bird which has a black body, distinctive red and… C.This image shows a Brewer Blackbird bird which has a sleek black body, iridescent feathers… D. This image shows a Yellow-headed Blackbird bird which has a black body, bright yellow head… A. This is a Spyker C8 Coupe 2009 car which has a distinctive propeller logo, sleek aerodynamic … Hard Easy Medium
Md. Atabuzzaman, Ali Asgarov, Christopher Thomas 0004
EMNLP1
2024 JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images
abstract
Existing vision-language understanding benchmarks largely consist of images of objects in their usual contexts.As a consequence, recent multimodal large language models can perform well with only a shallow visual understanding by relying on background language biases. Thus, strong performance on these benchmarks does not necessarily correlate with strong visual understanding. In this paper, we release JourneyBench, a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark of generated images designed to assess the model's fine-grained multimodal reasoning abilities across five tasks: complementary multimodal chain of thought, multi-image VQA, imaginary image captioning, VQA with hallucination triggers, and fine-grained retrieval with sample-specific distractors.Unlike existing benchmarks, JourneyBench explicitly requires fine-grained multimodal reasoning in unusual imaginary scenarios where language bias and holistic image gist are insufficient. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on JourneyBench and analyze performance along a number of fine-grained dimensions. Results across all five tasks show that JourneyBench is exceptionally challenging for even the best models, indicating that models' visual reasoning abilities are not as strong as they first appear. We discuss the implications of our findings and propose avenues for further research.
Zhecan Wang, Junzhang Liu, Chia-Wei Tang, Hani Alomari, Anushka Sivakumar, Rui Sun 0011, Md. Atabuzzaman, Hammad A. Ayyubi, Haoxuan You, Alvi Md. Ishmam, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Shih-Fu Chang, Christopher Thomas 0004
NeurIPS8