Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrien Bardes
dblp:292/3848
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 61% Image recognition and object detection · 14% 3D vision · 10% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning · ICLR 2023 Learning to Hallucinate Examples from Extrinsic and Intrinsic Supervision · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
non-contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision Tasks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › multi-scale representation learning
joint local and global feature learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › local feature descriptor
local descriptor learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised visual representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to Hallucinate Examples from Extrinsic and Intrinsic Supervision · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision Tasks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Features · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.2non-contrastive learning · 0.7benchmarking · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.6VICReg criterion · 0.6mentor model · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning
Quentin Garrido, Yubei Chen, Adrien Bardes, Laurent Najman, Yann LeCun |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Battle of the Backbones: A Large-Scale Comparison of Pretrained Models across Computer Vision TasksabstractNeural network based computer vision systems are typically built on a backbone, a pretrained or randomly initialized feature extractor. Several years ago, the default option was an ImageNet-trained convolutional neural network. However, the recent past has seen the emergence of countless backbones pretrained using various algorithms and datasets. While this abundance of choice has led to performance increases for a range of systems, it is difficult for practitioners to make informed decisions about which backbone to choose. Battle of the Backbones (BoB) makes this choice easier by benchmarking a diverse suite of pretrained models, including vision-language models, those trained via self-supervised learning, and the Stable Diffusion backbone, across a diverse set of computer vision tasks ranging from classification to object detection to OOD generalization and more. Furthermore, BoB sheds light on promising directions for the research community to advance computer vision by illuminating strengths and weakness of existing approaches through a comprehensive analysis conducted on more than 1500 training runs. While vision transformers (ViTs) and self-supervised learning (SSL) are increasingly popular, we find that convolutional neural networks pretrained in a supervised fashion on large training sets still perform best on most tasks among the models we consider. Moreover, in apples-to-apples comparisons on the same architectures and similarly sized pretraining datasets, we find that SSL backbones are highly competitive, indicating that future works should perform SSL pretraining with advanced architectures and larger pretraining datasets. We release the raw results of our experiments along with code that allows researchers to put their own backbones through the gauntlet here: https://github.com/hsouri/Battle-of-the-Backbones. Micah Goldblum, Hossein Souri, Renkun Ni, Manli Shu, Viraj Prabhu, Gowthami Somepalli, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Mark Ibrahim, Adrien Bardes, Judy Hoffman, Rama Chellappa, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2022 | VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learning
Adrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCun |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual FeaturesabstractMost recent self-supervised methods for learning image representations focus on either producing a global feature with invariance properties, or producing a set of local features. The former works best for classification tasks while the latter is best for detection and segmentation tasks. This paper explores the fundamental trade-off between learning local and global features. A new method called VICRegL is proposed that learns good global and local features simultaneously, yielding excellent performance on detection and segmentation tasks while maintaining good performance on classification tasks. Concretely, two identical branches of a standard convolutional net architecture are fed two differently distorted versions of the same image. The VICReg criterion is applied to pairs of global feature vectors. Simultaneously, the VICReg criterion is applied to pairs of local feature vectors occurring before the last pooling layer. Two local feature vectors are attracted to each other if their l2-distance is below a threshold or if their relative locations are consistent with a known geometric transformation between the two input images. We demonstrate strong performance on linear classification and segmentation transfer tasks. Code and pretrained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/facebookresearch/VICRegL Adrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCun |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning to Hallucinate Examples from Extrinsic and Intrinsic SupervisionabstractLearning to hallucinate additional examples has recently been shown as a promising direction to address few-shot learning tasks. This work investigates two important yet overlooked natural supervision signals for guiding the hallucination process – (i) extrinsic: classifiers trained on hallucinated examples should be close to strong classifiers that would be learned from a large amount of real examples; and (ii) intrinsic: clusters of hallucinated and real examples belonging to the same class should be pulled together, while simultaneously pushing apart clusters of hallucinated and real examples from different classes. We achieve (i) by introducing an additional mentor model on data-abundant base classes for directing the hallucinator, and achieve (ii) by performing contrastive learning between hallucinated and real examples. As a general, model-agnostic framework, our dual mentor-and self-directed (DMAS) hallucinator significantly improves few-shot learning performance on widely-used benchmarks in various scenarios. Liangke Gui, Adrien Bardes, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Alex Hauptmann 0001, Martial Hebert, Yu-Xiong Wang |
ICCV | 2 |