Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shixin Ye

dblp:292/5739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 67% Data mining · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › attributed network analysis
attributed graph mining
0.912025
With Anchors or Not: Fairness-Aware Truss-Based Community Search on Attributed Graphs · ICDE 2025
Graph data management
community search
0.912025
With Anchors or Not: Fairness-Aware Truss-Based Community Search on Attributed Graphs · ICDE 2025
Graph data management › community search
truss-based community search
0.912025
With Anchors or Not: Fairness-Aware Truss-Based Community Search on Attributed Graphs · ICDE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

k-truss model · 0.9greedy algorithm · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 With Anchors or Not: Fairness-Aware Truss-Based Community Search on Attributed Graphs
abstract
Community search, which finds cohesive subgraphs containing given query vertices, has attracted much attention in decades. On attributed graphs, when considering the fairness of members' attributes in a community, the cohesiveness constraint of a clique is too strong, which often causes no fair clique based communities can be found. Thus, in this paper, we use the k-truss model, which is a relaxation of the clique but whose members have large engagement and high tie strength, to describe fair communities, namely fair k-truss communities (FTC) and anchored fair k-truss communities (AFTC, using anchored vertices to help satisfying the fairness constraint). We formulate the FTC and AFTC search problems to find the FTC or AFTC containing a given query vertex$q$which has the largest$k$and the smallest diameter. We prove the hardness of both problems. We develop several greedy algorithms and acceleration strategies to solve FTC and AFTC search problems. Experiments on 8 real-world networks show the significance of our FTC and AFTC models, and high performance of our algorithms and acceleration strategies.
Xinrui Wang 0001, Shixin Ye, Xin Huang 0001, Hong Gao 0001, Xiuzhen Cheng, Dongxiao Yu
ICDE3