Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Navid Ardeshir

dblp:293/9443 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 82% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.712023
Intrinsic dimensionality and generalization properties of the R-norm inductive bias · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias
0.712023
Intrinsic dimensionality and generalization properties of the R-norm inductive bias · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory
0.712023
Intrinsic dimensionality and generalization properties of the R-norm inductive bias · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.512021
Support vector machines and linear regression coincide with very high-dimensional features · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › statistical learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.512021
Support vector machines and linear regression coincide with very high-dimensional features · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
interpolation
0.212023
Intrinsic dimensionality and generalization properties of the R-norm inductive bias · COLT 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.112021
Support vector machines and linear regression coincide with very high-dimensional features · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phase transition analysis · 1.0independent feature model · 1.0geometric characterization · 1.0r-norm minimization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Intrinsic dimensionality and generalization properties of the R-norm inductive bias
abstract
We study the structural and statistical properties of R-norm minimizing interpolants of datasets labeled by specific target functions. The R-norm is the basis of an inductive bias for two-layer neural networks, recently introduced to capture the functional effect of controlling the size of network weights, independently of the network width. We find that these interpolants are intrinsically multivariate functions, even when there are ridge functions that fit the data, and also that the R-norm inductive bias is not sufficient for achieving statistically optimal generalization for certain learning problems. Altogether, these results shed new light on an inductive bias that is connected to practical neural network training.
Navid Ardeshir, Daniel Hsu 0001, Clayton Sanford
COLT1
2021 Support vector machines and linear regression coincide with very high-dimensional features
abstract
The support vector machine (SVM) and minimum Euclidean norm least squares regression are two fundamentally different approaches to fitting linear models, but they have recently been connected in models for very high-dimensional data through a phenomenon of support vector proliferation, where every training example used to fit an SVM becomes a support vector. In this paper, we explore the generality of this phenomenon and make the following contributions. First, we prove a super-linear lower bound on the dimension (in terms of sample size) required for support vector proliferation in independent feature models, matching the upper bounds from previous works. We further identify a sharp phase transition in Gaussian feature models, bound the width of this transition, and give experimental support for its universality. Finally, we hypothesize that this phase transition occurs only in much higher-dimensional settings in the $\ell_1$ variant of the SVM, and we present a new geometric characterization of the problem that may elucidate this phenomenon for the general $\ell_p$ case.
Navid Ardeshir, Clayton Sanford, Daniel Hsu 0001
NeurIPS1