Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kelu Jiang
dblp:293/9772
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 82% Generative modeling · 10% Image recognition and object detection · 8% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
data privacy protection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ConfounderGAN: Protecting Image Data Privacy with Causal Confounder · NeurIPS 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
unlearnable examples |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ConfounderGAN: Protecting Image Data Privacy with Causal Confounder · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Training · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Training · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Training · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | ConfounderGAN: Protecting Image Data Privacy with Causal Confounder · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
image classification robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Training · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
noise generation · 1.1generative adversarial network · 1.1confounder property · 1.1adversarial training · 0.5PGD attack · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ConfounderGAN: Protecting Image Data Privacy with Causal ConfounderabstractThe success of deep learning is partly attributed to the availability of massive data downloaded freely from the Internet. However, it also means that users' private data may be collected by commercial organizations without consent and used to train their models. Therefore, it's important and necessary to develop a method or tool to prevent unauthorized data exploitation. In this paper, we propose ConfounderGAN, a generative adversarial network (GAN) that can make personal image data unlearnable to protect the data privacy of its owners. Specifically, the noise produced by the generator for each image has the confounder property. It can build spurious correlations between images and labels, so that the model cannot learn the correct mapping from images to labels in this noise-added dataset. Meanwhile, the discriminator is used to ensure that the generated noise is small and imperceptible, thereby remaining the normal utility of the encrypted image for humans. The experiments are conducted in six image classification datasets, including three natural object datasets and three medical datasets. The results demonstrate that our method not only outperforms state-of-the-art methods in standard settings, but can also be applied to fast encryption scenarios. Moreover, we show a series of transferability and stability experiments to further illustrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method. Qi Tian 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Kelu Jiang, Furui Liu, Zhihua Wang 0008, Fei Wu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial TrainingabstractAdversarial training is one of the most effective approaches to improve model robustness against adversarial examples. However, previous works mainly focus on the overall robustness of the model, and the in-depth analysis on the role of each class involved in adversarial training is still missing. In this paper, we propose to analyze the class-wise robustness in adversarial training. First, we provide a detailed diagnosis of adversarial training on six benchmark datasets, i.e., MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, STL-10 and ImageNet. Surprisingly, we find that there are remarkable robustness discrepancies among classes, leading to unbalance/unfair class-wise robustness in the robust models. Furthermore, we keep investigating the relations between classes and find that the unbalanced class-wise robustness is pretty consistent among different attack and defense methods. Moreover, we observe that the stronger attack methods in adversarial learning achieve performance improvement mainly from a more successful attack on the vulnerable classes (i.e., classes with less robustness). Inspired by these interesting findings, we design a simple but effective attack method based on the traditional PGD attack, named Temperature-PGD attack, which proposes to enlarge the robustness disparity among classes with a temperature factor on the confidence distribution of each image. Experiments demonstrate our method can achieve a higher attack rate than the PGD attack. Furthermore, from the defense perspective, we also make some modifications in the training and inference phase to improve the robustness of the most vulnerable class, so as to mitigate the large difference in class-wise robustness. We believe our work can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of adversarial training as well as rethinking the class-wise properties in robust models. Qi Tian 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Kelu Jiang, Fei Wu 0001, Yisen Wang 0001 |
KDD | 3 |