Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tadaaki Itoh

dblp:294/0656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › source coding › universal coding
competitive optimality
0.011995
Competitive optimality of source codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995
Coding theory › source coding › variable-length codes › prefix codes
huffman coding
0.011995
Competitive optimality of source codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995
Coding theory
source coding
0.011995
Competitive optimality of source codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

competitive analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Competitive optimality of source codes
abstract
Competitively optimal coding is considered and the following is proved. (1) If the competitively optimal code exists for a given source probability p(x), then it also attains the minimum expected codeword length. (2) If the Huffman code tree for p(x) is unbalanced in probability weight, then the competitively optimal code does not exist. Furthermore, the relation between competitively optimal coding and game theory is considered.
Hirosuke Yamamoto, Tadaaki Itoh
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2